Thorin... you do realize that ...
Re: We all have voices -- Thorin	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Danny ® 06/01/2005, 23:23:53 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

My original point about fence sitters had to do with those that have been critizising some of us by saying that "WE ARE TO BLAME" for having taken m literally when he said to 'surrender the reigns of our lives to him..'blah blah blah, and accusing some ex's that it is their own fault that they gave everything up in order to follow m??? It seems that many have misunderstood my point here and I just wanted to clarify that I am not in any way trying to "rate" anyone's personal dedication or sacrifice to m...only that those that have been speaking with such arrogant self important judgements of others here... commenting in such a 'matter of fact' manner that THEY didn't "fall" for or really believed that m claimed to be god incarnate, and that those that did have only themselves to blame!! I mean really!! Those are the one's that I am saying never really listened to m or attempted to follow m's "agya"! I can only conclude that they were in fact "fence sitters". Personally... my opinion is that these folks oughta read more posts and listen to what ex's are really saying before they critisize (sp) and pass judgement. Am I missing something here or perhaps I, in my unsophisticated manner have miscommunicated my actual intent here. So again I state that I have no respect for someone that (example) stuck their toe in the water and then left the beach claiming that they know exactly what swimming is AND THEN CRITISIZE THOSE THAT ACTUALLY WERE FULLY SUBMERGED IN THE WATER AND ARE NOW SPEAKING OUT ABOUT IT. How could they? So really my point is that those that had not ever taken m or his 'agya' seriously CANNOT FATHOM WHAT PAIN M HAS INFLICTED. I will repeat ... this has nothing to do with whether a person was an assramite or a 'community' premie or anything like that. THIS IS ABOUT THOSE THAT NEVER FULLY COMMITTED TO THE PRACTICE OF K OR EVER FULLY COMMITTED TO FOLLOWING M, AND THEN... COMING IN HERE AND TELLING EX'S THAT THEY WERE TO BLAME FOR ALL THAT HAPPENED, MOCKING SOME OF US FOR OUR STUPIDITY IN BELIEVING M WHEN HE SAID HE WAS THE LORD OF THE UNIVERSE. (see posts from Elaine, Jonx, Livia and other's) Whew! I was hoping my simple post wasn't gonna get so convoluted! Now ... I need a strong cocktail! Where is that 'hater's club" lounge mentioned above? And by the way.... seems we have all "realized knowledge" and for that I congratulate all of us! Modified by Danny at Wed, Jun 01, 2005, 23:25:41

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

I do now and apologise --- Thorin ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 01:45:43 ) ( 1547 bytes ) +1 No need... we are all in this together --- Danny ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 09:01:47 ) ( 889 bytes ) Re: Thorin... you do realize that ... --- Jonti ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 02:43:31 ) ( 1419 bytes ) link +1 Jonti... you are an exception to the rule! LOLOL! --- Danny ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 09:10:38 ) ( 370 bytes ) enough is enough --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 06:38:51 ) ( 8779 bytes ) +7 You do rather ask for it Livia --- hamzen ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 09:14:05 ) ( 637 bytes ) Is enough ... enough? --- Danny ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 09:36:53 ) ( 1850 bytes ) +2 Re: Is enough ... enough? --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 17:43:53 ) ( 3496 bytes ) +3 Don't be stupid, Livia --- Jim ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 18:57:32 ) ( 907 bytes ) +1 Rawat, A PUBLIC HAZZARD good one Jim (no text) --- Henna ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 17:17:55 ) ( 0 bytes ) Apology??? --- Danny ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 01:16:39 ) ( 3541 bytes ) Re: Rawat is a minor public hazard but also agree with Livia --- Andries ( Sun, Jun 05, 2005, 04:28:56 ) ( 443 bytes ) +1 oh, Andries --- Henna ( Mon, Jun 06, 2005, 17:10:23 ) ( 326 bytes ) Re: Is enough ... enough? --- Rjchinook ( Sat, Jun 04, 2005, 02:43:24 ) ( 357 bytes ) Your post is rather humorous, Livia --- Jim ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 11:27:28 ) ( 1128 bytes ) +1 Re: Your post is rather humorous, Livia --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 12:43:08 ) ( 1475 bytes ) +2 Liv, small question if I may? --- Thorin ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 13:15:46 ) ( 513 bytes ) +1 Re: Liv, small question if I may? --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 17:21:54 ) ( 1451 bytes ) +2 I thought you'd retired Livia.... --- PatD ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 20:09:35 ) ( 2202 bytes ) Re: Liv, small question if I may? --- Rjchinook ( Sat, Jun 04, 2005, 04:16:16 ) ( 399 bytes ) You're not thinking clearly, Livia --- Jim ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 13:59:52 ) ( 4023 bytes ) +1 Re: You're not thinking clearly, Livia --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 17:58:02 ) ( 2147 bytes ) +3 No, Livia, you do need to be picked apart. --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 18:17:59 ) ( 848 bytes ) +1 Re: No, Livia, you do need to be picked apart. --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 19:02:22 ) ( 1355 bytes ) +2 Gosh, maybe that's true, but I always thought... --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 19:21:02 ) ( 521 bytes ) Re: No, Livia, you do need to be picked apart. --- Rjchinook ( Sat, Jun 04, 2005, 15:53:12 ) ( 1248 bytes ) Re: You're not thinking clearly, Livia --- Jim ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 19:00:42 ) ( 369 bytes ) so don't post --- Henna ( Sun, Jun 05, 2005, 01:30:53 ) ( 5 bytes ) Livia is right. I'm moving on. I've been here more than 2 years --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 16:11:18 ) ( 780 bytes ) img +4 Re:Babaluji, is that your pic? (no text) --- Andries ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 16:35:28 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 That's me, alright, Andries. The years have gone by so fast and... --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 17:30:18 ) ( 677 bytes ) ROFL! What a great joke! BABALU.... you have made my day! (no text) --- Danny ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 17:26:59 ) ( 0 bytes ) I think we should have Term Limits here at the forum --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 21:50:26 ) ( 230 bytes ) Re: Livia is right. I'm moving on. I've been here more than 2 years --- bill ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 22:20:39 ) ( 200 bytes ) Livia, you are doing the same as Danny --- JHB ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 18:50:09 ) ( 1104 bytes ) +1 to John --- Livia ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 19:18:27 ) ( 1835 bytes ) +3 You're repeating that ridiculous analogy --- Jim ( Thu, Jun 02, 2005, 19:25:21 ) ( 668 bytes ) This is why you offend posters here, Livia --- JHB ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 00:52:52 ) ( 691 bytes ) +1 Thanks, JHB, and... --- Babaluji ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 01:39:32 ) ( 1609 bytes ) +1 Re: Thanks, JHB, and... --- Rjchinook ( Sat, Jun 04, 2005, 03:53:47 ) ( 995 bytes ) This shocks me --- Jonti ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 01:47:14 ) ( 1056 bytes ) Trying to set the parameters of the discussion... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 07:32:30 ) ( 9567 bytes ) That age-old dilemma, Livia --- Sir Dave ( Sun, Jun 05, 2005, 13:50:16 ) ( 706 bytes ) Re: Thorin... you do realize that ... --- Sulla ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 00:57:46 ) ( 2358 bytes )