Re: POV is now banned from this Forum
Re: POV is now banned from this Forum -- Pacific Mod	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: cq ® 10/19/2004, 14:18:55 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Hi there Pacific Mod - though Roger Daltry (for one) might just want to have a word with you about that self-description! (pacific=peaceful; Mod=not a Rocker, if you get my gist) Just for the record (and hopefully not just as a face-saving exercise) do you think it would be a good idea to say exactly what those "other reasons" were? I realise that POV's opinions were anathema to many exes, and that his dismissal of (and lack of empathy towards) one of the many victims of Jadgeo's abuse bordered on the offensive, but I feel he/she was at least trying to give honest responses to the questions and challenges we put. I know you are not obliged in any way to give reasons, but ... I think it might be a sensible idea.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

I'm not an FA, but... --- gerry ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 14:28:27 ) ( 463 bytes ) +1 Maybe Gerry, but ... --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:37:05 ) ( 598 bytes ) honest answers? --- dant ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 14:56:39 ) ( 875 bytes ) +2 Re: honest answers? --- toby ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:08:58 ) ( 325 bytes ) +3 Osterspaziergang: --- dant ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:33:48 ) ( 84 bytes ) +1 Re: Osterspaziergang: --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:58:52 ) ( 45 bytes ) What does Osterspaziergang mean metaphorically? --- Andries ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 12:06:35 ) ( 183 bytes ) +2 Does the English word "epiphany" apply here? --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 13:25:27 ) ( 601 bytes ) link +1 oy vah! --- dant ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 13:49:11 ) ( 1310 bytes ) +3 Thanks Dant. I'll take your word for it. (though why the "Easter"... (no text) --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 14:51:33 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2 Re: Thanks Dant. I'll take your word for it. (though why the "Easter&q... --- Andries ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:06:20 ) ( 112 bytes ) link +1 Andries, where are my Easter Eggs ? --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 07:29:37 ) ( 212 bytes ) Plan B from Easter Island --- dant ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:16:03 ) ( 650 bytes ) +1 Thank you so much. You don't mean to discourage questioning, i hope (no text) --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:44:59 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 say what? --- dant ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:57:18 ) ( 70 bytes ) +2 What? (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:20:27 ) ( 0 bytes ) Well ... (as Clouseau once said) "until we meet again, the case is sol-ved' (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:53:57 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 until we meet again... --- dant ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 16:15:04 ) ( 641 bytes ) +3 Are you serious?! LOL! --- Jim ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 16:26:29 ) ( 254 bytes ) come on. --- toby ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 00:32:41 ) ( 153 bytes ) +1 Re: come on. --- dant ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 04:54:23 ) ( 276 bytes ) +1 Re: come on. --- toby ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 08:15:17 ) ( 93 bytes ) +1 of course not! (no text) --- dant ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 08:22:26 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Re: of course not! --- toby ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 09:56:26 ) ( 531 bytes ) Re: until we meet again... --- cq ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 06:50:56 ) ( 165 bytes ) img Piece of cake --- Tempora ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 13:49:47 ) ( 245 bytes ) Re: oy vah!/ "Lovely Sunday walk in the woods." --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 19:04:26 ) ( 685 bytes ) +1 ach du liebe! --- dant ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 08:52:12 ) ( 1005 bytes ) +1 Sex in the woods. --- Lexy ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 11:31:40 ) ( 439 bytes ) +1 What the ferque? --- cq ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 13:36:27 ) ( 134 bytes ) +1 It wasn't me, honest. --- Lexy ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 18:08:22 ) ( 677 bytes ) +2 Epiphanic incubi! (sounds like something Captain Haddock might say) --- cq ( Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 02:41:37 ) ( 108 bytes ) img Wow, guys, I've written something immortal --- Neville B ( Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 11:39:40 ) ( 168 bytes ) +1 I AM A TROLL --- Lexy ( Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 13:43:40 ) ( 453 bytes ) +2 and Neville a Christian to boot! (no text) --- dant ( Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 18:52:41 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Shocking ! (no text) --- Lexy ( Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 19:44:38 ) ( 0 bytes ) oh no you're not --- cq ( Sun, Oct 24, 2004, 05:18:34 ) ( 135 bytes ) link +1 Oh Yes I................you reumbled me.I surrender........ --- Lexy ( Sun, Oct 24, 2004, 09:56:21 ) ( 303 bytes ) +1 surrender's not the way (despite what we were told) --- cq ( Sun, Oct 24, 2004, 10:47:48 ) ( 933 bytes ) img +1 Happy Nightmares! --- Lexy ( Sun, Oct 24, 2004, 17:11:08 ) ( 813 bytes ) +1 You like the pic? You'll love these, if you remember "Struwwelpeter&quo... --- cq ( Mon, Oct 25, 2004, 06:31:33 ) ( 474 bytes ) img +2 The madness of Mike Finch --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 25, 2004, 07:51:42 ) ( 476 bytes ) link img +1 <i>Another</i> epiphany!? Do tell! --- cq ( Mon, Oct 25, 2004, 14:32:58 ) ( 391 bytes ) file img +1 Insignificant Realizations --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 25, 2004, 16:10:58 ) ( 947 bytes ) +1 ... or realisations of insignificance? --- cq ( Tue, Oct 26, 2004, 00:37:23 ) ( 2183 bytes ) +1 Ashram Experiences..... --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 26, 2004, 11:34:56 ) ( 720 bytes ) +1 Re: Ashram Experiences..... --- cq ( Tue, Oct 26, 2004, 12:16:11 ) ( 372 bytes ) I remember "Struwwelpeter" ... --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 25, 2004, 18:43:03 ) ( 777 bytes ) Re: What does Osterspaziergang mean metaphorically? --- Duh! ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 00:15:51 ) ( 4074 bytes ) +1 Nice bit of Vogon poetry there, Duh! Babelfish have anything to do with it? --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 06:38:44 ) ( 1556 bytes ) +1 Thanks cq. it's a "darkness to light " allegory. --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 07:16:50 ) ( 250 bytes ) +1 Re: Thanks cq. it's a "darkness to light " allegory. --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:37:45 ) ( 241 bytes ) Toby, what does the word Osterspaziergang mean, in this context? (no text) --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:50:52 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Re: Toby, what does the word Osterspaziergang mean, in this context? --- toby ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 15:59:37 ) ( 256 bytes ) +1 Gersplundengeblutz! yeah, I do get what that word means now. (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 02:56:53 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 What does Gersplundengeblutz mean (no text) --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 07:44:52 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2 Re: What does Gersplundengeblutz mean --- toby ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 09:13:48 ) ( 478 bytes ) Re: What does Gersplundengeblutz mean --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 11:41:49 ) ( 465 bytes ) link +2 Re: What does Gersplundengeblutz mean --- toby ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 13:31:56 ) ( 226 bytes ) +2 Re: What does Gersplundengeblutz mean --- toby ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 13:51:42 ) ( 110 bytes ) Funny - I thought it was modelled on Henry Kissinger! (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 13:52:39 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Kissinger was born in Fürth,Germany, didn't you know? --- toby ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:01:37 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1 Uh, moment bitte, I must have speaks with Basil Fawlty .. (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:09:50 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 ah, equal goes it loose, (a german politician talking to the queen) (no text) --- toby ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:52:24 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 quite. Monarchs and politicians both - squitty politi (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 15:04:16 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: What does Gersplundengeblutz mean --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 13:54:25 ) ( 98 bytes ) +1 "annoy the mods"? - now look what you've done. Basil's on the loose!! (no text) --- cq ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 14:16:26 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: honest answers? --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:21:37 ) ( 960 bytes ) +4 "as honest a premie poster" --- Bunny ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:44:14 ) ( 528 bytes ) +1 "what lowly regard you hold premies in" --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:59:12 ) ( 625 bytes ) Re: honest answers? --- dant ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:50:01 ) ( 1013 bytes ) +1 Re: honest answers? --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:24:36 ) ( 206 bytes ) Re: honest answers? --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 15:50:32 ) ( 402 bytes ) +1 The offending post --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:16:09 ) ( 614 bytes ) +1 Re: The offending post --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:42:43 ) ( 525 bytes ) +1 this is not a "safe house" for anyone --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:49:26 ) ( 427 bytes ) +1 Re: this is not a "safe house" for anyone --- San ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 19:49:13 ) ( 467 bytes ) I wholeheartedly disagree --- San ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:48:25 ) ( 2572 bytes ) +2 You say "POV was not banned" ??? --- cq ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 16:57:55 ) ( 1009 bytes ) +3 I liked it better when you weren't on-line at home, actually... --- gerry ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 18:59:29 ) ( 58 bytes ) +1 Re: I liked it better when you weren't on-line at home, actually... --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 01:39:50 ) ( 75 bytes ) It's another way of looking at it --- San ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 19:18:22 ) ( 2887 bytes ) Yes, cq, you may go to bed, but first... --- Guru Maharaji ( Tue, Oct 19, 2004, 21:36:40 ) ( 178 bytes ) img +1 gaaaaaaah!!!! --- cq ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 01:44:02 ) ( 163 bytes ) Susan's situation is not easy to understand --- Andries ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 09:17:20 ) ( 345 bytes ) +1 No, Andries, you wouldn't have acted that way at all --- Jim ( Thu, Oct 21, 2004, 10:05:50 ) ( 1022 bytes ) Re: POV is now banned from this Forum --- billy ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 06:03:46 ) ( 557 bytes ) +1 Hey billy --- San ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 06:57:40 ) ( 1047 bytes ) +1 Re: Hey billy --- NikW ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 08:16:32 ) ( 1021 bytes ) +2 Disruptive Posters... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Oct 20, 2004, 09:29:40 ) ( 2538 bytes ) link Agreed. Nik --- Neville B ( Fri, Oct 22, 2004, 06:19:50 ) ( 364 bytes )