Re: honest answers?
Re: honest answers? -- dant Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
cq ®

10/19/2004, 15:21:37
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Admittedly I haven't read all of the posts here, Dant. But the ones I did read gave me the distinct impression that POV was trying to be as honest as he (/she?) could, whilst remaining "true" to Prem Rawat (who, let's face it - as far as his "message" has been down the decades, could be described as inconsistency incarnate).

Arrogant, smug, manipulative? Yup, that's a fair description of the premie mentality. I remember it well.

But that's where I was coming from when I was a premie. It colours where POV's coming from now. That's part and parcel of the premie trip.

But I sensed an attempt at honesty. And if the likes of POV are ever to comprehend the "ex-premie" viewpoint (if there is such a singular thing), then banning them from ever posting here isn't likely to do the cause of open dialogue and freedom of speech much good.

In my reckoning, POV was about as honest a premie poster on the ex-premie forum as you could hope for.







Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message