Glen Whittaker, nice guy?
Re: And BTW the guy -- Tempora	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Joe ® 04/14/2005, 15:14:55 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I don't know Glen, and he may be a "nice guy" who doesn't disparage ex-premies, but of course Glen has never publicly stated his disagreement with the cult for attacking us.  Nice?  Maybe.  Courageous of a man of conviction?  I think not. Glen also served as a disgraceful apologist for the cult in the Jagdeo sexual molestation matter, and wrote disingenuous letters to Anth about that.  Again, not so nice. Glen appears in the Passages Video as a part of the revisionism.  To be fair, it is possible that Glen's comments about saris and the like were taken out of context, but then, again, Glen has made no public statment that he does not support the lies in that video that his comments were used to support. It also appears that Glen reworked his own history to suit his master's current needs.  In that video he says that he never loved Maharaji until years after he got involved, but according to witnesses at the time, Glen gave many satsang speeches in which he blathered on about how much he loved Maharaji.  What he lying then, or is Glen lying now?  So, just because someone has a jovial nature, isn't a tyrant, and is pleasant on a personal level, does not, in my book, put him in a category of admiration or respect.  The fact remains that Glen served as an apologist for this cult, may have tried to help cover for or provide excuses for child sexual abuse when they came out in public, and has never to my knowledge made any public statement that he disagrees with anything the cult has done, including the CAC websites and other attacks on former premies.   A nice bloke would do that.   Modified by Joe at Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 15:24:36

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- Joe ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 15:20:29 ) ( 833 bytes ) +2 Re: Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- Thorin ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 15:47:15 ) ( 943 bytes ) link +3 Well, now that you mention it, Glen Whittaker is a bit of a scumbag. --- Joe ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 16:04:26 ) ( 1771 bytes ) Re: Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- Tempora ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 18:12:02 ) ( 1598 bytes ) +1 Re: Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- Joe ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 18:31:40 ) ( 2375 bytes ) +1 Re: Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Apr 15, 2005, 05:48:28 ) ( 1012 bytes ) link The nice guys --- PatD ( Fri, Apr 15, 2005, 16:34:57 ) ( 938 bytes ) +2 Re: The nice guys --- Thorin ( Fri, Apr 15, 2005, 16:57:17 ) ( 483 bytes ) +2 Re: The nice guys --- Voyeur ( Fri, Apr 15, 2005, 17:30:14 ) ( 581 bytes ) Crackerjack --- PatD ( Sun, Apr 17, 2005, 19:29:24 ) ( 700 bytes ) Thugs, slaves and slave-drivers --- Mike Finch ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 03:54:07 ) ( 1218 bytes ) +2 Re: Thugs, slaves and slave-drivers --- Lexy ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 13:29:32 ) ( 875 bytes ) Re: Thugs, slaves and slave-drivers --- PatD ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 14:07:05 ) ( 1993 bytes ) +3 Thanks for that Pat, I can relate --- Joe ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 17:11:50 ) ( 1615 bytes ) +1 Mike's forgetting his own Premie typology --- gerry ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 20:00:41 ) ( 134 bytes ) Re: Thugs, slaves and slave-drivers --- muttley ( Sat, Apr 16, 2005, 18:04:30 ) ( 424 bytes ) Pat and Joe and Gerry --- Mike Finch ( Mon, Apr 18, 2005, 09:58:51 ) ( 1173 bytes ) +1 To Mike --- Joe ( Tue, Apr 19, 2005, 12:37:56 ) ( 2813 bytes ) +1 Re: To Joe --- Mike Finch ( Tue, Apr 19, 2005, 14:58:19 ) ( 3031 bytes ) +1 Well, not exactly..... --- Joe ( Tue, Apr 19, 2005, 16:55:03 ) ( 3864 bytes ) +1 Re: Well, not exactly..... --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Apr 20, 2005, 02:04:26 ) ( 1363 bytes ) +2 Re: Well, not exactly..... --- PatD ( Wed, Apr 20, 2005, 11:43:26 ) ( 127 bytes ) +1 Re: Well, not exactly..... --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Apr 20, 2005, 13:47:33 ) ( 143 bytes ) Re: Well, not exactly..... --- Joe ( Wed, Apr 20, 2005, 15:57:12 ) ( 929 bytes ) Re: Also, regarding Glen Whittaker.... --- george ( Fri, Apr 15, 2005, 09:08:11 ) ( 149 bytes )