Thanks, Thorin, I had forgotten about those two incidents.  I have to say, though, in both cases, Glen ended up looking a bit of the buffoon.

First, he had to backtrack on his comments when a reporter in London reported the fact that EV was just DLM with a name change, and was the same organization, despite Glen's comments to the contrary.  Ooops.

In that letter to the editor, here's Glen's pathetic and laughable response to the fact that Rawat's obscene wealth was made off the backs of premies:

It is also unfair to allow to go unchallenged the suggestion that he has become rich from his many supporters.

Well Glen, you had the chance to "challenge the suggestion" but you didn't, did you?  How come?  Cuz you can't?  Anyhow, it's so unfair that somebody didn't so that, right Glen?

Here's how he lies about the Rawat's Gulfstream:

The private plane mentioned is not his, but is provided to allow him to complete his busy schedule, touring the world non-stop every year to present his message of peace to people who want to hear it.

No, it's not his Glen, it's technically owned by a shell corporation that he controls, and only he ever uses the plane, but it's not his, Glen, that's just so honest and forthcoming that comment.  Only Linda Gross says more ridiculous things than that in response to things that get in the press.  She seems to have no problem sounding like an idiot either.