I hope you're not blaming the family...
Re: Re: Response to a premie who thinks the ashram damage isn't Rawat's fault. -- jellydonut	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Cynthia ® 03/03/2005, 15:17:20 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I know of plenty of premies, especially ashram premies, whose families cut them off from inheritance money, and even money to finance their educations, because their families knew they were in a cult and refused to support them because of it. That medical student ashram premie was a rare exception in the scheme of ashrams and how they worked.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: I hope you're not blaming the family... --- jellydonut ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 15:29:03 ) ( 131 bytes ) +1 Bearing the cost...... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 15:32:45 ) ( 580 bytes ) +2 Re: Bearing the cost...... --- jellydonut ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 15:53:30 ) ( 55 bytes ) +1 The ashram cash cows..... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 16:16:15 ) ( 673 bytes ) +3 And all us nobody premies stuck in between, Joe... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 16:29:23 ) ( 526 bytes ) Do you guys remember the "used clothing" room at Broadripple? --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 16:43:37 ) ( 306 bytes ) +1 Re: Do you guys remember the "used clothing" room at Broadripple? --- jellydonut ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:02:22 ) ( 415 bytes ) +3 That happened to me, too! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:16:39 ) ( 416 bytes ) +1 Hey, Cynthia, that ain't nothing -- remember David Smith? --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:31:28 ) ( 952 bytes ) +3 I think I've blocked David Smith out of my mind... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:36:26 ) ( 173 bytes ) +1 Tall, curly hair, glasses, kind of sleepy looking, gave satsang mostly in a m... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:39:05 ) ( 501 bytes ) +1 You're describing a big percentage of the premie population! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:44:57 ) ( 315 bytes ) +1 But don't let the sleepy look fool you..... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:55:05 ) ( 895 bytes ) +1 My other "personal" experience with David Smith --- Babaluji ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 23:47:49 ) ( 3739 bytes ) But which one was he? --- Jim ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:40:36 ) ( 441 bytes ) +1 Re: But which one was he? --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 18:04:23 ) ( 1229 bytes ) +1 Here's what niggles at me --- Jim ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 18:13:29 ) ( 974 bytes ) +2 Surprised there wasn't more dehumanizing fanaticism... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 18:49:31 ) ( 2988 bytes ) Re: community premies thought ashram premies were nuts - I don't know about that --- paddy ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 21:30:35 ) ( 818 bytes ) +1 Renunciate? When he wasn't grabbing breasts! --- Cynthia ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 04:11:18 ) ( 439 bytes ) +1 Initiator Padarthanand (with a gleem in his eyes) --- Hilltop ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 22:53:02 ) ( 217 bytes ) file img Oh, yeah, I saw old David Smith back in 1997 or so --- Babaluji ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 23:01:53 ) ( 1725 bytes ) +1 Is that really true? Come on, now! --- Jim ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 23:33:32 ) ( 182 bytes ) They were just freeing you from "attachment" --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:20:09 ) ( 858 bytes ) +1 HAhahahahaha! --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:24:25 ) ( 371 bytes ) Speaking of clothes..... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 20:00:59 ) ( 362 bytes ) +1 Re: Speaking of clothes - The DECA elite..... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 05:02:14 ) ( 685 bytes ) +1 Let me guess -- --- Joe ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 13:35:31 ) ( 340 bytes ) Anne Johnston got international travel too --- PatD ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:14:52 ) ( 701 bytes ) +2 Not Anne... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:20:45 ) ( 165 bytes ) +3 Cynthia, just HOW do you know about the bra? Hmmmm? (no text) --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:23:02 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Ha! Got me Joe. --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:31:24 ) ( 350 bytes ) +1 Sounds uncomfortable (no text) --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:42:06 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Not Anne... --- JHB ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:28:52 ) ( 450 bytes ) +1 Poor Anne... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:41:13 ) ( 433 bytes ) +1 Re: Poor Anne... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:48:03 ) ( 905 bytes ) +1 Talk about extremes! And also how sad. --- Anna ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 18:21:00 ) ( 594 bytes ) +1 Yes, I think it is/was an American thing... --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 19:02:31 ) ( 424 bytes ) Re: Not Anne... --- quirky ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 22:14:38 ) ( 489 bytes ) +1 Re: Not Anne... --- Joe ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 16:47:03 ) ( 246 bytes ) +1 Re: Not Anne... --- quirky ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 22:07:30 ) ( 350 bytes ) +1 Anne's spotless house --- Joe ( Mon, Mar 07, 2005, 14:25:16 ) ( 296 bytes ) That might have been Sally Vanmanen --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:24:13 ) ( 214 bytes ) +1 Re: That might have been Sally Vanmanen --- PatD ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 17:44:11 ) ( 178 bytes ) +1 Dunno, Sally Vanmanen, I think is still a premie --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 19:41:26 ) ( 166 bytes ) +1 Re: Dunno, Sally Vanmanen, I think is still a premie --- shauna ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 20:23:19 ) ( 98 bytes ) +1 Is Sally a teacher? --- Joe ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 23:51:21 ) ( 89 bytes ) +1 Re: Is Sally a teacher? --- shauna ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 22:32:06 ) ( 245 bytes ) +1 Re: Is Sally a teacher? --- Cynthia ( Sat, Mar 05, 2005, 05:08:31 ) ( 421 bytes ) +1 Re: Is Sally a teacher? --- shauna ( Sun, Mar 06, 2005, 12:03:45 ) ( 178 bytes ) Here's a smoking gun about bearing the cost --- Babaluji ( Thu, Mar 03, 2005, 22:28:43 ) ( 2808 bytes ) +1 This is VERY important, can you begin a new thread? --- Joe ( Fri, Mar 04, 2005, 00:02:54 ) ( 343 bytes )