Two sad things about Jonx
			Forum

Posted by: Jim ® 01/28/2005, 20:50:43 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Two sad things worth noting about Jonx.  First, I find it rather interesting how, down below, he explains that Rawat was wrong when he said that the mind was our "greatest enemy" (it's only our "potential enemy" says Jonx).  Too bad Jonx doesn't have enough guts to actually discuss this.  Nonetheless, he said it and that's all that matters.  That's one confused "student" if you ask me. The other thing that's so noticeable is how predictably Jonx hides from the facts about Rawat.  We're talking real "eyes wide shut".  Anything the least bit troubling for him, he tries to dismiss as mere rumour and speculation.  But nowhere does he indicate the slightest interest of his own to learn the truth of the matter.  To Jonx, fire's never fire if you only see the smoke and you'll only see the smoke if you don't look too closely. For example, Jonx "answers" the criticism that Rawat "demand[s] fidelity from his wife while having adulterous affairs and keeping a mistress" as follows: Do you have proof he had affaires? I mean real proof. Anybody have the snapshots? Any whistle-blowing mistresses stepped forward? No? Wonder why. What's glaringly absent from his reply is any suggestion that he's ready and willing to know the truth of the matter.  Rather, what's so obvious here is that Jonx would rather play the ostrich than get to the bottom of this or any other issue that might shake his faith.   However, the truth might be even worse.  It's quite possible that Jonx really does know about Monica etc. in which case he's simply resorting to the worst kind of sophistry, demanding proof of a fact he himself believes to be true. Premies like Jonx are sad to observe.  They offer so little to respect what with all the surly dissembling and outright lies and whatnot.  Is there room for such a thing as an honourable premie anymore?  Forget honourable, how about just plain honest?  Jonx doesn't cut it.  Yadot1 sure doesn't either.  Likewise Premie Response.  All of these guys are rather ugly, quite frankly, at least judging by how they interact here.  Come on, surely there's at least one admirable premie out there .... No? Modified by Jim at Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 20:51:54

Previous

Recommend View All Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Two sad things about Jonx --- Paddy ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 20:59:45 ) ( 679 bytes ) +1 This is an interesting question for me, Paddy --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 21:15:08 ) ( 2333 bytes ) +1 Re: This is an interesting question for me, Paddy --- Paddy ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 23:25:26 ) ( 1522 bytes ) +2 Do you really need to insult me like that? --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 23:35:02 ) ( 91 bytes ) +1 Re: No insult intended! --- Paddy ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 19:40:24 ) ( 2589 bytes ) +3 Guess what Paddy ? --- Lexy ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 21:09:08 ) ( 726 bytes ) Re: No insult intended! --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 15:06:20 ) ( 7380 bytes ) +1 Re: No insult intended! --- Paddy ( Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 19:58:34 ) ( 2333 bytes ) +1 I kind of agree with you Paddy, but ....... --- JHB ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 01:29:11 ) ( 686 bytes ) Lies, means and ends --- Sulla ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 09:57:40 ) ( 1795 bytes ) +1 Re: Lies, means and ends --- Paddy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 13:59:24 ) ( 338 bytes ) +3 Re: Lies, means and ends --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 14:20:58 ) ( 698 bytes ) Re: Lies, means and ends --- Lexy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 17:40:49 ) ( 161 bytes ) Re: Lies, means and ends --- Sulla ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 17:49:31 ) ( 300 bytes ) +1 Re: Lies, means and ends --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 19:08:00 ) ( 370 bytes ) Paddy , and what about white? --- Sulla ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 10:22:08 ) ( 501 bytes ) +1 Re: Paddy , and what about white? --- Paddy ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 19:51:38 ) ( 596 bytes ) +1 Re: Paddy , and what about white, and my name? --- Sulla ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 08:35:30 ) ( 1340 bytes ) +1 Re: Paddy , and what about white, and my name? --- Paddy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 13:55:42 ) ( 331 bytes ) +1 Re: Paddy , and what about white, and my name? --- Sulla ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 17:27:48 ) ( 265 bytes ) Re: Two sad things about Jonx --- Cynthia ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 22:53:51 ) ( 3413 bytes ) +1 Funny you should say that --- Jim ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 22:58:59 ) ( 551 bytes ) +2 Do you like to live dangerously? --- Bunny ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 05:38:15 ) ( 163 bytes ) +2 Re: Do you like to live dangerously? --- Lexy ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 16:02:27 ) ( 290 bytes ) +1 Why thank you very much, Lexy (no text) --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 18:28:03 ) ( 0 bytes ) Hey, I can straighten this out --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 18:27:19 ) ( 348 bytes ) Re: Funny you should say that --- Cynthia ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 07:51:01 ) ( 82 bytes ) +1 There, that'll work! Thanks for the tip, Cynthia --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 18:30:49 ) ( 313 bytes ) Let's stop pussy-footing around... --- Babaluji ( Fri, Jan 28, 2005, 23:40:42 ) ( 426 bytes ) +2 Thousand Oaks................................. (no text) --- Toby ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 03:51:58 ) ( 0 bytes ) know what you mean --- dant ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 13:16:16 ) ( 1261 bytes ) +1 I agree, dant. And here's what's really scary... --- Babaluji ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 14:00:04 ) ( 219 bytes ) img +1 Wouldn't Donald Sutherland be more premie-like? (no text) --- Neville B ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 18:48:04 ) ( 0 bytes ) Eyes wide shut --- billy ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 17:21:36 ) ( 990 bytes ) +3 What the hell are you talking about, Billy? --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 29, 2005, 17:43:38 ) ( 879 bytes ) +1 Re: What the hell are you talking about, Billy? --- billy ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 14:39:26 ) ( 545 bytes ) +4 That's not good enough, Billy -- be fair now --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 14:56:39 ) ( 819 bytes ) +1 Re: That's not good enough, Billy -- be fair now --- billy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 07:40:05 ) ( 323 bytes ) +1 Now you're not making any sense --- Jim ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 09:44:42 ) ( 522 bytes ) +1 sorry Jim but this is boring.. (no text) --- billy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 10:13:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) Just talk if you want, Billy... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 18:12:44 ) ( 1230 bytes ) +1 Re: Just talk if you want, Billy... --- billy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 08:06:32 ) ( 203 bytes ) +1 Re: Just talk if you want, Billy...Sheesh! --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 09:42:17 ) ( 698 bytes ) +1 Re: Just talk if you want, Billy...Sheesh! --- billy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 10:10:38 ) ( 391 bytes ) +1 Re: Just talk if you want, Billy...Sheesh! --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 10:27:40 ) ( 99 bytes ) Don't take any notice of Jim, Billy...(modif.) --- Lexy ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 18:23:51 ) ( 325 bytes ) link +1 Re: Don't take any notice of Jim, Billy...(modif.) --- billy ( Tue, Feb 01, 2005, 11:53:18 ) ( 156 bytes ) He's not so tough --- jonx ( Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 18:54:08 ) ( 260 bytes ) Re: Eyes wide shut --- NikW ( Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 05:43:28 ) ( 972 bytes ) Re: Eyes wide shut --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 10:01:53 ) ( 633 bytes )