Re: Try reading my post again, it's about joining!
Re: don't agree -- Henna	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: paddy ® 09/10/2005, 20:39:14 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Try reading my post again and you will see that I am referring to the process of joining the cult as was Lexy with whom I disagreed. Nobody could receive K without making vows but nobody can make vows like that without them being subject to future events. Nobody was giving up their reasoning as I noticed they all still reasoned well enough to arrive at satsang on time and leave at the end, etc. If you are reasoning on the false premise that Rawat is God then you will make mistakes of judgment but your reasoning is still intact which is shown by your exiting when your beliefs altered whether that talk 1 month, 1 year, 1 decade or 2 or 3. We are talking about the way things are and were.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Why did we join? --- Sir Dave ( Sat, Sep 10, 2005, 22:34:31 ) ( 214 bytes ) +2 Re: Why did we join? --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 01:45:26 ) ( 7 bytes ) +1 You were with rawat for 6 years? --- Henna ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 07:01:24 ) ( 22 bytes ) +1 Re: You were with rawat for 6 years? --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 16:40:13 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 Your reply raises questions once again --- JHB ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 00:34:05 ) ( 492 bytes ) +2 Re: Your reply raises questions once again --- Jethro ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 02:27:31 ) ( 1024 bytes ) +1 That's how I remember it Jethro..... --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 04:24:40 ) ( 2736 bytes ) Re: Sorry JHB Ji --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 02:36:10 ) ( 816 bytes ) +5 HELP ! Does anybody understand Paddy's post ? --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 03:27:24 ) ( 595 bytes ) +2 More compassion than me Lexy --- hamzen ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:16:20 ) ( 89 bytes ) Re: HELP ! Does anybody understand Paddy's post ? --- NikW ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 08:27:44 ) ( 1162 bytes ) +1 Re: the Spanish Flu --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 16:36:38 ) ( 412 bytes ) Divide and rule --- hamzen ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:20:52 ) ( 138 bytes ) +1 Re: Divide and rule --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:39:47 ) ( 652 bytes ) What is this, a contest? --- Henna ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 08:30:38 ) ( 1323 bytes ) Loving SS&M was never the main issue --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 10:09:03 ) ( 627 bytes ) +1 Re: Loving SS&M was never the main issue --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 16:57:50 ) ( 1812 bytes ) +1 We're finally getting somewhere --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:48:11 ) ( 1470 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 18:45:45 ) ( 1830 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- JHB ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 01:46:30 ) ( 1101 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- paddy ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 02:49:27 ) ( 958 bytes ) Oh, and regarding this bit..... --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 13:52:24 ) ( 467 bytes ) Re: Why did we join? --- Neville B ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 03:02:50 ) ( 729 bytes ) +1 How I walked into the trap --- Sir Dave ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 04:38:35 ) ( 1332 bytes ) +3 Re: How I walked into the trap --- Jethro ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 04:42:48 ) ( 115 bytes ) What's fascinating here... --- Neville B ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 08:13:24 ) ( 613 bytes ) Re: "just" --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 21:54:49 ) ( 359 bytes ) +1 Re: "just" --- PatD ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 07:47:08 ) ( 1436 bytes ) +1 Good post Pat --- Joe ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 18:21:00 ) ( 1433 bytes ) +1 Good post Joe (nt) (no text) --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 18:41:11 ) ( 0 bytes )