I can and do rationally discuss Rawat with some of my premie friends but the discussion cannot go very far because the only positive evidence they have for Rawat's validity is their own life and there is not much possibility for debate ("Yes it is". "No it's not". "Yes it is". ...) over whether someone else's experience of life warrants belief in the efficacy of Rawat and his Knowledge and that can be a very confronting and unpleasant discussion for the premie.Now I am prepared to accept your understanding of yourself as having fear at the heart of your so-called relationship with Rawat which after all was only ever a projection of a relationship in your mind. I was well aware that if Knowledge was true then Rawat had to be "our Saviour" but I didn't experience that. Once again you are saying I didn't understand the message. I understood it but I also understood that part of the message was that this was not supposed to be a belief but an experience so I wasn't concerned about my lack of belief.
However when you state that this is at the heart of all premies' "relationship" with Rawat I say maybe but probably not. Remember I've been seeing premies for 30 years and what I perceive at the heart of the relationship is the joy they get from the times they see Rawat. A large proportion of the premies that keep in touch are pretty slack. Half of them might go to an event starring the Speaker but do no service or attend few if any meetings. If fear was at the heart of the relationship I imagine they'd be doing more for EV but if a certain affection and joy is at the heart then their actual involvement is understandable.
And your statement that "the premie does not even recognise that fear is at the heart of their relationship with Rawat" is non-falsifiable and unprovable. It has to be taken on faith.
