don't agree
Re: I've got to agree -- Neville B	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Henna ® 09/10/2005, 19:51:29 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Not again!!! The suggestion that we had no choice is, IMO, one that reduces our humanity. We had to be stripped off our humanity in order to believe and he did just that, little by little.  To believe in him and stay we had to give up our reasoning.  Doesn't that in itself says something? WE WERE BRAINWASHED AND THEREFORE WE GOT TRAPPED AND THAT IS THE ONLY REASON WHY WE DID NOT LEAVE FOR MORE THAN TWO DECADES. How different we began to understand his gig when we doubt him and left.  That cannot be overlooked.  That explains what occured well and it points to something very strange and abusive that happened to us, yes, BECAUSE WE BELIEVE D him.  What choice we had.  After all, we were told that we "should try it and THEN and ONLY THEN we could know if it was good or not.  But you have to recognize, our humanity had changed to that point, we had already become devotees.  Nobody could receive K without promising complete loyalty to rawat forever and ever. What are you people talking about??

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Try reading my post again, it's about joining! --- paddy ( Sat, Sep 10, 2005, 20:39:14 ) ( 698 bytes ) +1 Why did we join? --- Sir Dave ( Sat, Sep 10, 2005, 22:34:31 ) ( 214 bytes ) +2 Re: Why did we join? --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 01:45:26 ) ( 7 bytes ) +1 You were with rawat for 6 years? --- Henna ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 07:01:24 ) ( 22 bytes ) +1 Re: You were with rawat for 6 years? --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 16:40:13 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 Your reply raises questions once again --- JHB ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 00:34:05 ) ( 492 bytes ) +2 Re: Your reply raises questions once again --- Jethro ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 02:27:31 ) ( 1024 bytes ) +1 That's how I remember it Jethro..... --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 04:24:40 ) ( 2736 bytes ) Re: Sorry JHB Ji --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 02:36:10 ) ( 816 bytes ) +5 HELP ! Does anybody understand Paddy's post ? --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 03:27:24 ) ( 595 bytes ) +2 More compassion than me Lexy --- hamzen ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:16:20 ) ( 89 bytes ) Re: HELP ! Does anybody understand Paddy's post ? --- NikW ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 08:27:44 ) ( 1162 bytes ) +1 Re: the Spanish Flu --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 16:36:38 ) ( 412 bytes ) Divide and rule --- hamzen ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:20:52 ) ( 138 bytes ) +1 Re: Divide and rule --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 04:39:47 ) ( 652 bytes ) What is this, a contest? --- Henna ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 08:30:38 ) ( 1323 bytes ) Loving SS&M was never the main issue --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 10:09:03 ) ( 627 bytes ) +1 Re: Loving SS&M was never the main issue --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 16:57:50 ) ( 1812 bytes ) +1 We're finally getting somewhere --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:48:11 ) ( 1470 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 18:45:45 ) ( 1830 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- JHB ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 01:46:30 ) ( 1101 bytes ) +1 Re: I understand the difference --- paddy ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 02:49:27 ) ( 958 bytes ) Oh, and regarding this bit..... --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 13:52:24 ) ( 467 bytes ) Re: Why did we join? --- Neville B ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 03:02:50 ) ( 729 bytes ) +1 How I walked into the trap --- Sir Dave ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 04:38:35 ) ( 1332 bytes ) +3 Re: How I walked into the trap --- Jethro ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 04:42:48 ) ( 115 bytes ) What's fascinating here... --- Neville B ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 08:13:24 ) ( 613 bytes ) Re: "just" --- paddy ( Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 21:54:49 ) ( 359 bytes ) +1 Re: "just" --- PatD ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 07:47:08 ) ( 1436 bytes ) +1 Good post Pat --- Joe ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 18:21:00 ) ( 1433 bytes ) +1 Good post Joe (nt) (no text) --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 18:41:11 ) ( 0 bytes )