Common Sense IS the most uncommon thing
			Forum

Posted by: San ® 02/04/2005, 06:55:17 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Remember that one?  Great satsang in it own right, that one sentence, I must say. Let's apply common sense to this whole paradigm we call being an ex-premie. Without itemizing, I think we can all agree that we are all aware of the major issues that made us become ex-premies and we are all becoming somewhat aware of a much darker side of the thing as well. I present this question in the light of Common Sense:  Why would God Almighty send someone to earth to reveal His Knowledge to Humanity who has so many personal issues as Prem does?  Why would God Almighty use someone with so many issues in his life contradictory to God's Law, thereby confusing those who seek Him, to represent Him?  Would Prem Rawat have a premie serve at his private residence who he knew had all the same habits as he does?  Would he allow just anyone to be alone with his kids just because they are an instructor? I am not judging Prem Rawat.  To judge is as bad or worse than anything he or his people did. I am just calling it like I see it.  Viewpoints can change but the past is prologue and written in the Akasha and in our collective hearts and minds and cellular memories.  The present and future are ours to co-create, and those who do not learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.        Common sense, most uncommon thing... Modified by San at Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 07:06:48

Previous

Recommend View All Current page

Next

Replies to this message

This is an excellent point, San!... --- Cynthia ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 07:09:48 ) ( 146 bytes ) Re: Common Sense IS the most uncommon thing --- NikW ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 08:11:40 ) ( 1717 bytes ) +3 We agree in essence, just semantics (no text) --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 08:28:46 ) ( 8 bytes ) +1 Actually, that's not true, San --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 11:21:56 ) ( 211 bytes ) +2 San... THIS is agreeing in essence --- NAR ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:22:53 ) ( 475 bytes ) Excuse me? --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:10:54 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1 God, San, that's ridiculous! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:36:01 ) ( 2066 bytes ) +1 What ridiculous is how you ratchet it all up --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:59:16 ) ( 818 bytes ) +1 Being spiritual is never having to admit you're wrong about anything --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:03:39 ) ( 252 bytes ) +1 Again, your own words, not mine --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:10:57 ) ( 1127 bytes ) +1 Quit playing the victim -- it's time you own your stuff! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:31:56 ) ( 21 bytes ) +1 You are an example of the pride and judgement I speak of --- San ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 00:04:28 ) ( 1017 bytes ) Absolutamente --- Joe ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:12:32 ) ( 778 bytes ) +3 Bubble consciousness --- hamzen ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:20:27 ) ( 421 bytes ) +1 Right, it's one of the (many) downsides of "new age" --- Joe ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:28:01 ) ( 302 bytes ) +1 Joe --- bill ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 12:49:13 ) ( 905 bytes ) Very good point --- Toby ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:37:55 ) ( 1244 bytes ) +1 Toby, thanks for the insight --- JHB ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 17:43:58 ) ( 595 bytes ) About this judge / not judge thing --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:29:56 ) ( 970 bytes ) +2 Typical nonsense statement --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:46:51 ) ( 614 bytes ) +1 Re: Typical nonsense statement --- Tom Gubler ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:31:06 ) ( 1319 bytes ) +1 Re: Typical nonsense statement --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:42:56 ) ( 2117 bytes ) Re: About this judge / not judge thing --- NikW ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 06:07:57 ) ( 1920 bytes ) +1 Re: About this judge / not judge thing --- San ( Sun, Feb 06, 2005, 12:32:25 ) ( 744 bytes ) I CAN'T STAND THIS ANY MORE --- Neville B ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 05:33:02 ) ( 1086 bytes ) +2 Neville, chill out guy! (ot) --- dant ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 13:22:45 ) ( 814 bytes ) +1 Actually, Dant..... --- Jim ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 14:34:55 ) ( 415 bytes ) +2 Oh that part of the thread! --- dant ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 14:44:37 ) ( 180 bytes ) Re: Actually, Dant..... hehehe (no text) --- Dermot M ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 16:46:06 ) ( 0 bytes ) I agree with Neville --- Tempora ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 15:38:41 ) ( 1433 bytes ) +1 Re: I agree with you Tempora... --- Cynthia ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 16:37:29 ) ( 1357 bytes ) +2 John Macgregor and EPO --- JHB ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 17:13:59 ) ( 839 bytes ) +1 John Macgregor and EPO --- Tempora ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 18:34:56 ) ( 590 bytes ) +1 Mishler and Dettmers are also no longer on EPO's home page! --- JHB ( Sun, Feb 06, 2005, 01:40:45 ) ( 1260 bytes ) +1 Fair enough, John! --- Tempora ( Sun, Feb 06, 2005, 05:11:24 ) ( 40 bytes ) Re: I agree with you Tempora, Neville & Cynthia --- PatD ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 17:27:43 ) ( 1332 bytes ) +1 Stiffening --- NikW ( Sun, Feb 06, 2005, 03:46:11 ) ( 250 bytes ) +1 Cramp, lol, you're probably right......... --- PatD ( Sun, Feb 06, 2005, 15:09:01 ) ( 125 bytes )