I never said judging is 'some terrible thing'.  That is yours.  Own it.

I love your New Age jargon.  "Own it"  Really, it's good to have a little comic relief at times.  "Own it".  LOL!  Okay, San, I'll "own it".  I'll own it as being the truth, how's that?  Here, take a look at what you said again:

I am not judging Prem Rawat.  To judge is as bad or worse than anything he or his people did.

Of course you're saying that judging is terrible.  You think that at least some of what Rawat's done is terrible, don't you?  You've only said so a million times in a million different ways.  So if you're saying that judging is "as bad or worse than anything he or his people did" it's only logical that you're saying that judging is terrible.  Quit playing games, will you?

If one knows, then one can judge.  How's that?  Thing is, one can judge without having a witchhunt or a crucifixion or even a bad vibe, unless it is called for under the circumstances in the moment.  That's what I was talking about.

Well, again, you must be corrected.  This last bit here, your new rule about judging when one "knows" as opposed to when one doesn't, isn't the least bit what you were "talking about".  What you were talking about is what you said:  "to judge is as bad or worse than anything he or his people did."  Couldn't be clearer.  Perhaps you've since rethought this point and wish to change your statement.  No problem there but don't pretend that that's what you meant all along.  No one's going to believe that.

Finally, looking now at your new point about judging without witchunts, crixufictions or bad vibes, I really don't know what you're talking about.  Do you?