Actually, that's not true, San
Re: We agree in essence, just semantics (no text) -- San	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Jim ® 02/04/2005, 11:21:56 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

In fact, you don't agree in essence.  You claim that judging is some terrible thing and Nik says it's natural, important and good.  That's call disagreeing.  Look it up. Modified by Jim at Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 11:22:24

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

San... THIS is agreeing in essence --- NAR ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 12:22:53 ) ( 475 bytes ) Excuse me? --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:10:54 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1 God, San, that's ridiculous! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:36:01 ) ( 2066 bytes ) +1 What ridiculous is how you ratchet it all up --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 18:59:16 ) ( 818 bytes ) +1 Being spiritual is never having to admit you're wrong about anything --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:03:39 ) ( 252 bytes ) +1 Again, your own words, not mine --- San ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:10:57 ) ( 1127 bytes ) +1 Quit playing the victim -- it's time you own your stuff! --- Jim ( Fri, Feb 04, 2005, 19:31:56 ) ( 21 bytes ) +1 You are an example of the pride and judgement I speak of --- San ( Sat, Feb 05, 2005, 00:04:28 ) ( 1017 bytes )