Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that
Re: Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that -- songster	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: jonx ® 10/06/2005, 17:34:30 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

If someone can demonstrate pretty conclusively that Maharaji said he is a "the" rather than an "a" would it then be okay still for you to maintain the "a" concept? I don't give a damn what Maharaji said about the subject. The only thing I care about is what I know. That is the only thing I want to "believe". That said, if he were to say something I would take it seriously, because I have discovered that being open to what he says causes me to learn wonderful things. But at the end of the day, I respect what I know more than what someone is telling me, no matter who they are. It gets me to thinking. Over the years there have been two kinds of premies: one who looks at themself in the mirror and says, "I am a premie because Maharajii is the Lord", and the other who says, "I am a premie because it feels good". The latter is happier and less easily confounded by all the stuff you guys labour over. The former confuses easily and I dare say is most likely to become an ex-premie. I suspect that is something he saw years ago, which prompted him to move away from all this Lord stuff and focus on the feeling. Of course as we all know, that move confused you guys even more.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Good news, Jonx --- Neville B ( Thu, Oct 06, 2005, 18:15:29 ) ( 100 bytes ) Exactly --- premie_spouse ( Thu, Oct 06, 2005, 20:25:25 ) ( 1780 bytes ) +3 . (no text) --- hamzen ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 06:56:44 ) ( 0 bytes ) It is scary for premies to even consider --- Henna ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 07:55:49 ) ( 2258 bytes ) I pity your husband --- jonx ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 18:09:56 ) ( 604 bytes ) +2 I pity you. --- premie_spouse ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 12:16:00 ) ( 534 bytes ) +2 I pity all of them --- Henna ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 14:54:53 ) ( 590 bytes ) A joke, eh? --- jonx ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 17:57:24 ) ( 120 bytes ) img +1 On the contrary --- premie_spouse ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 18:18:59 ) ( 1176 bytes ) +2 Then why doesn't it add up --- jonx ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:52:22 ) ( 577 bytes ) img +2 Jonx would really make one hell of a good marriage guidance councellor, would... --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 05:35:51 ) ( 148 bytes ) To Jonx --- Admin ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 10:29:16 ) ( 243 bytes ) +1 Re: To Mod --- jonx ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 11:02:42 ) ( 172 bytes ) +1 Re: To Mod --- Admin ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 12:11:12 ) ( 624 bytes ) link +1 Re: To Mod --- jonx ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 02:13:19 ) ( 305 bytes ) +1 To Jonx --- Admin ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 11:14:15 ) ( 643 bytes ) link Jonx's venomous posts to you say a lot about him --- Bunny ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 09:37:48 ) ( 800 bytes ) +1 Hear, hear, Bunny --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 16:08:25 ) ( 215 bytes ) With this post Jonx has achieved a new low (no text) --- Neville B ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 15:08:34 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that --- songster ( Thu, Oct 06, 2005, 22:49:29 ) ( 5973 bytes ) +2 Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that --- Danny ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 02:03:47 ) ( 2217 bytes ) Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that --- jonx ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 09:34:51 ) ( 7414 bytes ) +4 Exactly why am I a fool Jonx? --- hamzen ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 09:57:59 ) ( 610 bytes ) +1 Dunno... could be nature; could be nurture. --- jonx ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 17:55:32 ) ( 2472 bytes ) img +3 Your slip is showing --- Henna ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 19:09:46 ) ( 1767 bytes ) The con goes on --- Neville B ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 01:25:01 ) ( 736 bytes ) There you go again, and sooo many concepts, ohh dear --- hamzen ( Mon, Oct 10, 2005, 05:09:28 ) ( 3547 bytes ) Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that --- Henna ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 15:57:17 ) ( 373 bytes ) link Two types of premies? --- Neville B ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 16:36:24 ) ( 498 bytes ) "So what?" He took a vow, that's what. --- premie_spouse ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 14:13:15 ) ( 575 bytes ) Jonx, you've finally admitted what I said about you months ago --- Neville B ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 16:49:49 ) ( 370 bytes ) +1 Neville I'm finally sick of hearing from you --- jonx ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 18:03:10 ) ( 455 bytes ) +1 Now you resort to ad hominem --- Neville B ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 01:08:04 ) ( 500 bytes ) +1 That would be 'bad' hominem --- jonx ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 10:02:31 ) ( 995 bytes ) +1 This you call argument --- Neville B ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 11:02:05 ) ( 330 bytes ) +1 Re: This you call argument --- jonx ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 17:50:58 ) ( 593 bytes ) +1 Incredible...just incredible --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 05:31:13 ) ( 556 bytes ) +1 Re: Incredible...just incredible --- jonx ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 10:43:45 ) ( 1159 bytes ) +1 Shall we try to weigh up the positive and the negative? --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 12:43:41 ) ( 834 bytes ) +1 Like I said... selective filtering --- jonx ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 02:09:17 ) ( 36 bytes ) +1 No please...by all means tell me what I missed out (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 08:59:21 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Jonx, you're brighter than that --- Steve ( Fri, Oct 07, 2005, 20:28:09 ) ( 1586 bytes )