What's it all about, anyway?
			Forum

Posted by: Marianne ® 09/28/2005, 21:24:17 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Hi folks. So what is Rawat about these days? What is he trying to achieve? What is the focus of EV and TPRF? Do premies/PWKs really understand the message they are given by Rawat and the cult? A quick perusal of the TPRF site shows a section entitled "Humanitarian Initiatives". There are 9 different entries under that title, describing supposed humanitarian work or monetary donations made by TPRF. These entries include support for Hurricane Katrina victims, tsunami victims, and those in need of medical care in India. Were humanitarian intiatives always part of Rawat's focus? No, according to Lewis, an Australian PWK. He said: Maharaji is not Mother Theresa Lewis to Gerry re Marianne Bachers "When was the last time Captain Rawat mentioned compassion and suggested some practical application of it in the real world -- feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, caring for orphans, rebuilding war or famine torn countries? No, compassion and gratitude are one way streets in the land of Rawat, and both have a dead end: at his feet." Don't laugh. Marianne Bachers actually said that, and more. Here we see the true brain rotting consciousness of the ex-premie guilty vengence mindset. You must 'do good' to 'feel good'. Or rather you must be SEEN to do good, what you actually achieve is irrelevant. Maharaji got it all wrong - he should have copied Mother Theresa! What Ms Bachers wants to see is a hero with plaudits and plaques and backpats and honours - or, in the case of some of her heroes, a bullet. Yes, Bachers wants M to be a world changing humantarian, serving food to the poor in Chicago, challenging those damn greenie politicians, championing the oil industry, giving out vaccines in Guatemala, more 'research' money to Lockheed, new clothes to the homeless in Iceland, tractors to the Eritraens, all the goodie stuff that gets you into Time magasine and onto WMF recipient scheme lists. Bachers, please tell us....Why didn't Jimi Hendrix spend his life giving guitar lessons and free instruments to the boys in the gettos of Harlem, New Orleans, Minnisotta, Miami and Delaware? Why didn't he stop playing that damn guitar for five minutes and teach others in the third world how to enjoy basket weaving? Why didn't his money and energy go towards saving the forests of Borneo? God, he was such a selfish overindulgent self agrandising, greedy young whippersnapper wasn't he? As for that Picasso, the bloody cheeck of the man using up all that paint, ink and canvas!! Yes, I'll take the cuddly feelbad world of Marianne Bachers any day - work in constant peril of losing your precious employment and (apparently only) identity. Have nobody inspire anybody - and as a hobby to release all that pent up frustration have a naive, fearful internet hate group think you actually care about them - by writing soppy, trite, insincere welcomes to any drifter that drops by and expresses the correct amount of negative disdain for their past. Gerry, you do this Marianne womans' PR wonders with your constant support of her. Now, how about another disgusting, libelous, deeply insulting attack on Deb just to remind us how well Bachers has schooled you? Lewis, May 10th 2003 ----- So what is he all about, anyway? Or was Lewis just mistaken? Marianne

Previous

Recommend View All Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Jimi Hendrix??? --- Danny ( Wed, Sep 28, 2005, 23:12:01 ) ( 425 bytes ) +1 Re: Jimi Hendrix??? --- AJW ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 04:19:58 ) ( 1069 bytes ) +3 snow plough drivers --- dant ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 05:25:23 ) ( 441 bytes ) Opinion --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 08:32:59 ) ( 3214 bytes ) +10 Re: Opinion --- songster ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 08:51:54 ) ( 470 bytes ) +1 Typical ex thinking from songster --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 19:36:11 ) ( 484 bytes ) Re: Opinion --- Toby ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 09:01:51 ) ( 708 bytes ) +1 To toby --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 19:45:02 ) ( 404 bytes ) +4 So reporter... --- Marianne ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:01:19 ) ( 270 bytes ) +1 For Marianne --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:09:40 ) ( 125 bytes ) +2 So clever --- Marianne ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:22:34 ) ( 516 bytes ) +1 Clever? --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 22:56:05 ) ( 224 bytes ) +1 You are the insider --- Marianne ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 23:05:01 ) ( 80 bytes ) +1 Then you must be the outsider --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 23:15:54 ) ( 37 bytes ) +2 Re: Then you must be the outsider --- Marianne ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 23:17:45 ) ( 88 bytes ) good grief --- premie_spouse ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 22:42:29 ) ( 167 bytes ) Re: The usual lies by the Rotporter --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 02:36:10 ) ( 450 bytes ) Ohhhhhhhhhh --- Henna ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:02:54 ) ( 356 bytes ) Re: To toby --- Toby ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 00:21:04 ) ( 715 bytes ) Re: Shri Maharaji gave Knowledge to millions, 5 or so million wasn't it? --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 00:49:05 ) ( 876 bytes ) +1 exactly --- dant ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 05:45:33 ) ( 1468 bytes ) +3 Re: exactly --- Toby ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 07:03:55 ) ( 408 bytes ) Ahh but there's the germs --- hamzen ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 12:15:38 ) ( 106 bytes ) Re: concentration of resources --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 16:32:15 ) ( 914 bytes ) +1 generating money --- dant ( Sat, Oct 01, 2005, 02:32:36 ) ( 377 bytes ) Re: Opinion --- 13 ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 09:20:14 ) ( 1493 bytes ) +1 To 13 --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 19:53:59 ) ( 681 bytes ) +3 Shameful, Orwellian abuse of language --- Jim ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:06:58 ) ( 375 bytes ) +2 Obuse of language?? --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:11:12 ) ( 45 bytes ) +1 You mean one that spells "abuse" with an "o"? LOL! --- Jim ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:20:45 ) ( 246 bytes ) +1 Typical ex-premie behavior from Jim --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 23:14:17 ) ( 5362 bytes ) link +1 Typical brain mush from a cult member --- Jim ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 01:27:20 ) ( 389 bytes ) We missed this one Jim --- Henna ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:11:18 ) ( 425 bytes ) link Re: To 13 --- 13 ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 01:30:46 ) ( 308 bytes ) If M isn't perfect why are you worshipping him? (no text) --- Neville B ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 10:56:11 ) ( 0 bytes ) Shall we take these one at a time? --- Neville B ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 09:26:28 ) ( 604 bytes ) +1 For Neviile --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 19:59:07 ) ( 406 bytes ) +2 Re: For Neviile --- Toby ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 04:54:34 ) ( 245 bytes ) link Kinda missing the point, aren't you? --- Neville B ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 10:47:48 ) ( 933 bytes ) disturbing --- Will ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 09:30:02 ) ( 1739 bytes ) +2 Good one Will --- Marshall ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 12:33:26 ) ( 511 bytes ) Typical ex thinking from Will --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:07:59 ) ( 557 bytes ) +3 Amazing!!!! just a small comment --- Jethro ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 07:22:36 ) ( 226 bytes ) Yes, let's talk about your "experience" --- Neville B ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 11:14:56 ) ( 642 bytes ) Re: Typical ex thinking from Will --- quirky ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 21:18:49 ) ( 320 bytes ) I agree with everything you say almost --- dant ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 12:16:55 ) ( 635 bytes ) +1 For Dant --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:13:54 ) ( 228 bytes ) +1 Speak for yourself --- dant ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 05:52:02 ) ( 161 bytes ) +1 Put another 'roo on the barbie, mate! --- Jim ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 13:54:52 ) ( 13 bytes ) Re: Opinion --- Tempora ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 13:14:27 ) ( 2266 bytes ) +1 For Tempora --- reporter ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:18:56 ) ( 101 bytes ) +1 Re: For Tempora --- Toby ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 23:54:10 ) ( 560 bytes ) Opinion --- premie_spouse ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 14:42:42 ) ( 1029 bytes ) +1 Re: Opinion --- NikW ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 17:14:46 ) ( 583 bytes ) It's sad to see words used this way --- Jim ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 18:13:06 ) ( 707 bytes ) Reporter, stop squirming and answer the questions. --- AJW ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 09:16:23 ) ( 281 bytes ) Re: Jimi Hendrix??? --- OTS ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 22:56:28 ) ( 1459 bytes ) +2 Fab. Post ...OTS --- Lexy ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 05:54:06 ) ( 55 bytes ) Hi OTS Never say never --- Jethro ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 22:29:11 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1 "I don't think so re "Bolero" (no text) --- OTS ( Sat, Oct 01, 2005, 08:38:30 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Re: "I don't think so re "Bolero" --- PatD ( Sat, Oct 01, 2005, 20:45:11 ) ( 70 bytes ) +1 "Bolero" was written before he was born and will be around --- Jethro ( Sun, Oct 02, 2005, 01:25:37 ) ( 100 bytes ) link Where did "Lewis" the PWK say this, Marianne? --- Lexy ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 05:03:16 ) ( 1078 bytes ) +1 Hi Lexy --- Marianne ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 19:26:30 ) ( 431 bytes ) He is the total opposite, he robbed from his devotees --- Henna ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 08:50:34 ) ( 2348 bytes ) link +1 Re: He is the total opposite, he robbed from his devotees --- Helen ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 13:46:28 ) ( 629 bytes ) +3 Re: He is the total opposite, he robbed from his devotees --- davidm ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 14:00:22 ) ( 62 bytes ) Excuse me??? --- premie_spouse ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 14:46:51 ) ( 76 bytes ) Hi Helen! --- JHB ( Sat, Oct 01, 2005, 01:16:32 ) ( 507 bytes ) Re: What's it all about, anyway? --- Tempora ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 12:30:40 ) ( 1239 bytes ) What a tangled web we weave........ --- PatD ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 16:08:51 ) ( 1316 bytes ) +1 When first we practise to deceive --- Tempora ( Fri, Sep 30, 2005, 05:26:04 ) ( 202 bytes ) What's he all about, anyway? --- Dr.wow ( Thu, Sep 29, 2005, 20:37:17 ) ( 1347 bytes )