A number of points actually.

a) Do you usually say, "All power to him" when you encounter drunk drivers? (See Dettmer's testimony re M's drunk driving.)

b) Why is it acceptable that M ordered premies to abstain from alcohol (and drugs, sex, possessions, relationships etc.) while indulging in these things himself? Isn't this hypocrisy?

c) If knowledge doesn't change you then what's the point of it? If it doesn't change your relationship to obviously destructive vices then what's the point of it? (Is it actually any use for anything?)

d) If there's nothing wrong with drinking then why did M go to such lengths to hide it via his X-rated system, by which only special trusted premies were allowed to see him drinking (and smoking dope etc.)?

That'll do for starters. There's plenty more to go.

So carry on , Reporter. I await your response with interest.

Neville B