Re: Of course it's not a cult, Jon
Re: Of course it's not a cult, Jon -- JHB	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: jonx ® 07/13/2005, 19:17:14 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Okay, I'll bite. There was a time when it was a cult. I'll be first to admit that. For some it no doubt still is. But that is a subjective reality projected onto the whole thing by a misguided individual. I'll also be the first to admit that in years past I too was one of those misguided people who followed the crowd more than my own heart, and it of course bent me somewhat out of shape. But as time passed, the substance of Knowledge deepened. And if there wasn't underlying substance, then I would agree a cult is all that it is. But substance there is! So you tell me John, if there wasn't substance, what is it people get attracted to today, given all that stuff you mention is soooo passé? Because, as much as ex-premies do their best to downplay it, a lot of people are still getting interested and pursuing Knowledge... in the comfort of their own broadband internet service I might add.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

What is the substance? --- gerry ( Wed, Jul 13, 2005, 19:21:47 ) ( 396 bytes ) So if it was once a cult, Jonx, was Rawat once a cult LEADER? --- Jim ( Wed, Jul 13, 2005, 22:39:34 ) ( 239 bytes ) +1 See my note to JHB <eom> (no text) --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 12:55:40 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Why? So you can slip out of answering? --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 13:17:48 ) ( 104 bytes ) +2 And btw, here's another question you can avoid! --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 13:34:53 ) ( 1600 bytes ) +2 Re: Here is my 2 cents on how he got to where he is... --- MickCable ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 14:59:08 ) ( 1507 bytes ) +2 You know, that's as good an assessment as any (with one caveat) --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 17:09:24 ) ( 390 bytes ) +2 The cleanliness obsession is an interesting one you missed Mick too --- hamzen ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:31:53 ) ( 48 bytes ) +1 Re: The cleanliness obsession is an interesting one you missed Mick too --- MickCable ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 01:48:54 ) ( 90 bytes ) +1 Big fear of germs --- hamzen ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 05:52:04 ) ( 149 bytes ) Re: You know, that's as good an assessment as any (with one caveat) --- MickCable ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 01:47:41 ) ( 332 bytes ) +1 Yes and no, Mick --- Jim ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 18:19:46 ) ( 1541 bytes ) +1 Re: Yes and no, Mick --- mickcable ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 21:42:42 ) ( 164 bytes ) He doesn't give a damn about his own mother. --- gerry ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:19:21 ) ( 134 bytes ) Re: And btw, here's another question you can avoid! --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:09:12 ) ( 1912 bytes ) +1 This is very laughable, Jonx -- always a pleasure! --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:57:30 ) ( 476 bytes ) Re: Why? So you can slip out of answering? --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 17:47:52 ) ( 1111 bytes ) +1 You're talking out of both sides of your mouth (as usual) --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:12:20 ) ( 630 bytes ) +1 You're displaying the depth of a slug Jim (as usual) --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:25:15 ) ( 318 bytes ) +1 Don't blame me for your dilemna --- Jim ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 20:29:49 ) ( 364 bytes ) +1 Re: Don't blame me for your dilemna --- jonx ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 10:49:56 ) ( 2066 bytes ) +4 I challenged you on substance, jonx and you ignored me --- gerry ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 11:36:09 ) ( 1732 bytes ) The reason your argument lacks merit --- JHB ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 13:03:39 ) ( 624 bytes ) Yet another hilarious, unintentional admission on your part, Jonx! --- Jim ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 13:07:07 ) ( 350 bytes ) +1 You really are a fool Jim --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 04:45:18 ) ( 728 bytes ) +3 Jon, do you really believe propagation is happening? --- JHB ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 08:27:49 ) ( 678 bytes ) +1 You'd be a fool to think it isn't --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 08:33:26 ) ( 148 bytes ) +1 Answer my post about Arti and Darshan --- JHB ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 08:58:12 ) ( 325 bytes ) +1 Re: Answer my post about Arti and Darshan --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 17:41:23 ) ( 257 bytes ) +3 Jon, where's your pride? --- Jim ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 18:10:32 ) ( 2940 bytes ) So why can't you just be honest --- JHB ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 18:55:54 ) ( 425 bytes ) Re: Answer my post about Arti and Darshan --- MickCable ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 23:50:31 ) ( 510 bytes ) +1 Yes, MC, you're completely right -- but there's more --- Jim ( Mon, Jul 18, 2005, 11:31:38 ) ( 485 bytes ) +1 Re: Yes, MC, you're completely right -- but there's more --- MickCable ( Mon, Jul 18, 2005, 17:51:19 ) ( 596 bytes ) Oh my God, I can't believe you just did that AGAIN! LOL!! --- Jim ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 10:41:21 ) ( 892 bytes ) +1 Re: Oh my God, I can't believe you just did that AGAIN! LOL!! --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 17:56:30 ) ( 389 bytes ) img +1 I did read it -- and I've got your number perfectly, IMHO --- Jim ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 18:24:26 ) ( 339 bytes ) Is this the same K that Jesus, Buddha, and Krishna taught? --- gerry ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 11:36:31 ) ( 1407 bytes ) +2 Yeah, and they were so well received, weren't they? (no text) --- jonx ( Sun, Jul 17, 2005, 17:57:44 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Is this the same K that Jesus, Buddha, and Krishna taught? --- MickCable ( Mon, Jul 18, 2005, 00:00:16 ) ( 84 bytes ) +1 Almost missed this post, Mick --- gerry ( Tue, Jul 19, 2005, 09:31:59 ) ( 150 bytes ) Discussion??? --- Danny ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 16:58:26 ) ( 938 bytes ) But, Jon, you still kiss his feet and sing Arti! --- JHB ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 01:27:45 ) ( 569 bytes ) +1 Re: But, Jon, you still kiss his feet and sing Arti! --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 12:55:00 ) ( 1273 bytes ) +1 I could almost feel sorry for you --- premie_spouse ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 14:35:43 ) ( 490 bytes ) This Sounds like a good time to talk about 'Agya' --- Hilltop ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 01:48:17 ) ( 319 bytes ) file img Utter BS! --- Danny ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 09:14:33 ) ( 2486 bytes ) +2 Great points, Danny. Great thread. This is a ***BEST*** --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 11:47:03 ) ( 336 bytes ) link +1 Re: Great points, Danny. Great thread. This is a ***BEST*** --- MickCable ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 15:10:32 ) ( 418 bytes ) +1 MickCable, your presence is certainly appreciated --- Babaluji ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 15:59:00 ) ( 1653 bytes ) +1 Re: MickCable, your presence is certainly appreciated --- MickCable ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 02:14:44 ) ( 2159 bytes ) Re: Utter BS! --- jonx ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 18:35:49 ) ( 853 bytes ) +2 Re: Utter BS! --- Danny ( Thu, Jul 14, 2005, 21:59:06 ) ( 2448 bytes ) Re: Utter BS! --- MickCable ( Fri, Jul 15, 2005, 02:21:16 ) ( 760 bytes )