Maharaji by virtue of his message is illegitimate in the eyes of the world. This subjective, perception is a fact you guys regularly fall back on when your position is challenged into a checkmate.

This is the exact same foolishness you pulled over the issue of whether or not Rawat's a cult leader.  You make a concession -- in this case that Rawat is or was illegitimate -- but when confronted and asked to really consider the implications of what you've admitted, you pretend you weren't conceding anything, that it was just a matter of "subjective perception".

Jon, on the simplest, most basic grammatical level, you can't stay in the ring.  You're unable to maintain essential logic and the fair meaning of words.  This really is funny.  Pathetic, indeed, but funny as well.

What else you got?

LOL!!!