Re: Revelation
Re: Revelation -- reporter	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: paddy ® 10/02/2005, 23:25:22 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I was having lunch with my first wife and our kids the other day and as the short Big Kahuna was in town the subject of DLM came up. We both agreed we'd been young, foolish and naive but as we'd both had a lot of fun in DLM we had no bad feelings. Mind you it's not easy having bad feelings when your lunching with your adult children overlooking Burleigh beach on a glorious spring day. It turns out that our son even got something out of it. Whenever people are discussing their strange upbringings at dinner parties (there's a lot of people his age who had them) he always trumps everyone else with his childhood in a cult with the most ridiculous guru of them all who used to dress up as a pudgy Krishna and stumble around the stage for a few minutes while universes were created and destroyed depending upon which arm he was flailing. Apparently it's always a big hit especially when he leaps up on the table dressed in nothing but a table cloth with a jug on his head and borrowed jewels all over and does his Prem Rawat dancing imitation. Actually I was not the sort of person who believed wacko ideas like that but I do recall that it was an initiator who gave that explanation for Rawat's lack of graceful twinkle toes and he said it came from the mouth attached to the Lotus Feet itself. It might have been that cowdung smoothie Noo York taxidriver or an Australian initiator who inspired his audiences with that gem of a concept. I can remember a One Foundation song: Leaving your Lotus Feet Oh where would I go? Who else has the power to free me from Maya, etc, etc But far from having slipped into sadness and depression after leaving those lotus feet my life got happier and happier and I'm quite happy to meet any premies in an inner peace and happiness competition anywhere, anyplace, anytime. We can get a neutral judging team to decide who is the happier and more innerly peaceful and I mean deep within inner peace. We can enter teams in the next Olympic Inner Peace and Happiness competition. The Reporter's team of premies fresh from Amaroo 2005 and teams of randomly chosen ex-premies. I'm so confident I'm happier than most premies that I'll even take a huge happiness handicap, I'll pick Jim Heller on my team. Righto mate, let's work together on getting this organised.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Happiness and Ex-premies --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 00:38:19 ) ( 1264 bytes ) +1 But John .... --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 01:14:37 ) ( 1087 bytes ) +3 "Where's the joy" --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 01:48:54 ) ( 1789 bytes ) +1 Warn others? --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:17:16 ) ( 1555 bytes ) +6 Re: Warn others? --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:25:39 ) ( 207 bytes ) +1 Actually it's "Keep in touch" --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:04:17 ) ( 145 bytes ) +2 Re: Actually it's "Keep in touch" --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:17:42 ) ( 145 bytes ) So you don't even read your Lord's website? --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:31:58 ) ( 724 bytes ) link +2 Clearly Reporter isn't in touch! --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:42:35 ) ( 280 bytes ) No apology for you John --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:21:48 ) ( 541 bytes ) +3 Re: No apology for you John --- songster ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:27:56 ) ( 139 bytes ) +1 Well done songster --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:36:05 ) ( 132 bytes ) +1 Re: Well done songster --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:12:11 ) ( 68 bytes ) Well I and hundreds of other premies..... --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:37:56 ) ( 387 bytes ) How can you tell it's only a recommendation? --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 03:28:30 ) ( 526 bytes ) Following this line of reasoning --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:54:41 ) ( 2296 bytes ) +1 Following this line of reasoning --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:13:16 ) ( 599 bytes ) +3 Re: Following this line of reasoning --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:11:46 ) ( 453 bytes ) +1 Poor Kate --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:28:34 ) ( 310 bytes ) +2 Re: Poor Kate --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:46:08 ) ( 144 bytes ) Re: Poor Kate --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:50:22 ) ( 768 bytes ) Get real Reporter --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:26:04 ) ( 889 bytes ) Re: Following this line of reasoning --- Steve ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 17:03:20 ) ( 1851 bytes ) +1 very good --- Henna ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:41:00 ) ( 273 bytes ) img Re: Warn others? --- Neville B ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:57:32 ) ( 393 bytes ) +1 Apologise???? --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:22:48 ) ( 911 bytes ) +8 Re: Apologise???? --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:32:09 ) ( 424 bytes ) +1 Sure Toby. --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:34:13 ) ( 523 bytes ) +4 Re: Sure Toby. --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:06:07 ) ( 1204 bytes ) +1 Point of order, Anna --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:37:28 ) ( 237 bytes ) +1 gold-plated toilet bowl ? --- 13 ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 06:28:44 ) ( 70 bytes ) YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY NUTS!!!!! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 21:17:36 ) ( 377 bytes ) Re: Sure Toby. --- Toby ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 01:15:01 ) ( 468 bytes ) So I guess you DON'T have a relationship with M, then (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:21:31 ) ( 0 bytes ) Neville, you are "nutty" --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:22:25 ) ( 418 bytes ) +1 So we "never listened", eh? --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:15:02 ) ( 138 bytes ) +1 Burning the Divine Times --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:38:29 ) ( 813 bytes ) +2 Good point--I'll have to find a source for that item (no text) --- Neville B ( Wed, Oct 05, 2005, 02:15:02 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Burning the Divine Times --- george ( Thu, Oct 06, 2005, 06:50:10 ) ( 506 bytes ) The guru's private life --- RGJ ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:34:47 ) ( 909 bytes ) +1 Rob's faulty logic --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:51:42 ) ( 872 bytes ) +6 Bullshit! --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:25:08 ) ( 1064 bytes ) +1 RIGHT ON Anne --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 19:07:38 ) ( 544 bytes ) Reporter's usual bs --- RGJ ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 22:32:17 ) ( 1555 bytes ) Here's a better analogy for you, Reporter --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:35:33 ) ( 1239 bytes ) +3 barbecue sensors --- 13 ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:48:45 ) ( 85 bytes ) +1 I can do better than sensors! --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 14:59:31 ) ( 270 bytes ) Open and shut case --- T ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:50:29 ) ( 613 bytes ) Right on John (no text) --- songster ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 09:29:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) It's like wading through treacle --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:18:53 ) ( 230 bytes ) This Pavarotti cannot sing. This teacher of peace has no peace. (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:27:03 ) ( 0 bytes ) reporter I agree with you 100% --- Steve ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:40:37 ) ( 1254 bytes ) Now you're making me laugh Reporter --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:41:39 ) ( 676 bytes ) Re: Apologise???? YES! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 19:00:23 ) ( 1033 bytes ) Re: Apologise???? --- Steve ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:35:26 ) ( 944 bytes ) and shagging monica, don't forget that --- hamzen ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:59:26 ) ( 71 bytes ) Reporter, you have a very stange view of exes --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:07:26 ) ( 738 bytes ) Re: Warn them that Rawat has no secret ingredient --- paddy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 04:18:17 ) ( 1523 bytes ) +1 Open your eyes (NT) (no text) --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 08:31:01 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Warn others? --- Dr.wow ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:09:45 ) ( 2084 bytes ) Simple it is --- Henna ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 20:18:35 ) ( 509 bytes ) We've answered that, but you're just not listening --- Neville B ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:50:28 ) ( 300 bytes ) +1 GREAT QUOTE!! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 07:22:39 ) ( 209 bytes ) Re: But ...... --- Danny ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 08:53:51 ) ( 4582 bytes ) But really --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 00:59:48 ) ( 150 bytes ) +2 Yes, let's talk about betrayal of trust --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 01:06:41 ) ( 501 bytes ) +1 Let's talk about a rejection of trust --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 02:07:29 ) ( 1745 bytes ) +4 Now i understand your conflict --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 02:50:42 ) ( 653 bytes ) Let's continue your analogy of a relationship --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 02:51:37 ) ( 694 bytes ) +1 Hurting other people? --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:27:23 ) ( 835 bytes ) +1 Re: Absolutely clear and absolutely wrong --- paddy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:29:59 ) ( 2101 bytes ) That is a simple lie --- Neville B ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 04:19:05 ) ( 808 bytes ) bullshit --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 07:59:15 ) ( 1173 bytes ) link Re: No contradiction, no revelation --- paddy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:07:03 ) ( 2103 bytes ) +1 Paddy, can you support this from experience? --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:57:34 ) ( 283 bytes ) +1 Yes, as much as it pains me to say this --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:13:14 ) ( 116 bytes ) +1 Re: I'm strongly opposed to the use of drugs --- paddy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:30:06 ) ( 763 bytes ) +1 LOL (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:46:38 ) ( 0 bytes )