Re: Happiness and Ex-premies
Re: Re: Revelation -- paddy	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: JHB ® 10/03/2005, 00:38:19 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

We can enter teams in the next Olympic Inner Peace and Happiness competition. The Reporter's team of premies fresh from Amaroo 2005 and teams of randomly chosen ex-premies. I'm so confident I'm happier than most premies that I'll even take a huge happiness handicap, I'll pick Jim Heller on my team. As ex-premies (former followers of Prem Rawat) have largely moved on and gone their separate ways, it would be hard to find a representative group, but the ex-premies I've met all seem pretty happy, and the one thing we agree on is that we are very happy to have made the decision to leave Rawat. The exhiliaration of regaining the freedom of our minds, and the relief at rejoining the human race as an ordinary person - not someone who has the special secret to life - are experiences that Reporter cannot imagine, and therefore does not even recognise, let alone believe. So the premise of Reporter's post is simply wrong. Ex-premies are not wallowing in anger and misery. Sure there are probably ex-premies who are suffering, but if Reporter is honest he will admit that there are premies who live sqalid, unhappy, lives. Hey, I've even met Jim Heller, and he comes across as a very happy guy (well who wouldn't with such a wonderful partner!). John.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

But John .... --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 01:14:37 ) ( 1087 bytes ) +3 "Where's the joy" --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 01:48:54 ) ( 1789 bytes ) +1 Warn others? --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:17:16 ) ( 1555 bytes ) +6 Re: Warn others? --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:25:39 ) ( 207 bytes ) +1 Actually it's "Keep in touch" --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:04:17 ) ( 145 bytes ) +2 Re: Actually it's "Keep in touch" --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:17:42 ) ( 145 bytes ) So you don't even read your Lord's website? --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:31:58 ) ( 724 bytes ) link +2 Clearly Reporter isn't in touch! --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:42:35 ) ( 280 bytes ) No apology for you John --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:21:48 ) ( 541 bytes ) +3 Re: No apology for you John --- songster ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:27:56 ) ( 139 bytes ) +1 Well done songster --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:36:05 ) ( 132 bytes ) +1 Re: Well done songster --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:12:11 ) ( 68 bytes ) Well I and hundreds of other premies..... --- Lexy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:37:56 ) ( 387 bytes ) How can you tell it's only a recommendation? --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 03:28:30 ) ( 526 bytes ) Following this line of reasoning --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:54:41 ) ( 2296 bytes ) +1 Following this line of reasoning --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:13:16 ) ( 599 bytes ) +3 Re: Following this line of reasoning --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:11:46 ) ( 453 bytes ) +1 Poor Kate --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:28:34 ) ( 310 bytes ) +2 Re: Poor Kate --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:46:08 ) ( 144 bytes ) Re: Poor Kate --- dant ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:50:22 ) ( 768 bytes ) Get real Reporter --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:26:04 ) ( 889 bytes ) Re: Following this line of reasoning --- Steve ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 17:03:20 ) ( 1851 bytes ) +1 very good --- Henna ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:41:00 ) ( 273 bytes ) img Re: Warn others? --- Neville B ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:57:32 ) ( 393 bytes ) +1 Apologise???? --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:22:48 ) ( 911 bytes ) +8 Re: Apologise???? --- Toby ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 15:32:09 ) ( 424 bytes ) +1 Sure Toby. --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:34:13 ) ( 523 bytes ) +4 Re: Sure Toby. --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:06:07 ) ( 1204 bytes ) +1 Point of order, Anna --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:37:28 ) ( 237 bytes ) +1 gold-plated toilet bowl ? --- 13 ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 06:28:44 ) ( 70 bytes ) YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY NUTS!!!!! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 21:17:36 ) ( 377 bytes ) Re: Sure Toby. --- Toby ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 01:15:01 ) ( 468 bytes ) So I guess you DON'T have a relationship with M, then (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:21:31 ) ( 0 bytes ) Neville, you are "nutty" --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:22:25 ) ( 418 bytes ) +1 So we "never listened", eh? --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:15:02 ) ( 138 bytes ) +1 Burning the Divine Times --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:38:29 ) ( 813 bytes ) +2 Good point--I'll have to find a source for that item (no text) --- Neville B ( Wed, Oct 05, 2005, 02:15:02 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Burning the Divine Times --- george ( Thu, Oct 06, 2005, 06:50:10 ) ( 506 bytes ) The guru's private life --- RGJ ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 16:34:47 ) ( 909 bytes ) +1 Rob's faulty logic --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:51:42 ) ( 872 bytes ) +6 Bullshit! --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 18:25:08 ) ( 1064 bytes ) +1 RIGHT ON Anne --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 19:07:38 ) ( 544 bytes ) Reporter's usual bs --- RGJ ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 22:32:17 ) ( 1555 bytes ) Here's a better analogy for you, Reporter --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:35:33 ) ( 1239 bytes ) +3 barbecue sensors --- 13 ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:48:45 ) ( 85 bytes ) +1 I can do better than sensors! --- JHB ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 14:59:31 ) ( 270 bytes ) Open and shut case --- T ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 04:50:29 ) ( 613 bytes ) Right on John (no text) --- songster ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 09:29:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) It's like wading through treacle --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:18:53 ) ( 230 bytes ) This Pavarotti cannot sing. This teacher of peace has no peace. (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:27:03 ) ( 0 bytes ) reporter I agree with you 100% --- Steve ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 18:40:37 ) ( 1254 bytes ) Now you're making me laugh Reporter --- Anna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 17:41:39 ) ( 676 bytes ) Re: Apologise???? YES! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 19:00:23 ) ( 1033 bytes ) Re: Apologise???? --- Steve ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:35:26 ) ( 944 bytes ) and shagging monica, don't forget that --- hamzen ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:59:26 ) ( 71 bytes ) Reporter, you have a very stange view of exes --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 05:07:26 ) ( 738 bytes ) Re: Warn them that Rawat has no secret ingredient --- paddy ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 04:18:17 ) ( 1523 bytes ) +1 Open your eyes (NT) (no text) --- reporter ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 08:31:01 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Warn others? --- Dr.wow ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 20:09:45 ) ( 2084 bytes ) Simple it is --- Henna ( Tue, Oct 04, 2005, 20:18:35 ) ( 509 bytes ) We've answered that, but you're just not listening --- Neville B ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 03:50:28 ) ( 300 bytes ) +1 GREAT QUOTE!! --- Henna ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 07:22:39 ) ( 209 bytes ) Re: But ...... --- Danny ( Mon, Oct 03, 2005, 08:53:51 ) ( 4582 bytes )