Three answers
Re: Sincerity, honesty, and reliability: three questions about gurus -- Andries	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: reporter ® 10/08/2005, 17:14:18 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Is Rawat sincere? Undoubtedly, he has been spreading the same message for nearly 40 years. Is Rawat dishonest? (Yes, he keeps or kept his his private life from his followers????) No, wanting to have a private life is everyone\'s right. Is he reliable? He is the epitome of reliability. He has been giving the same message and teaching the same techniques for nearly 40 years.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Answers? We're all waiting --- premie_spouse ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 17:44:36 ) ( 965 bytes ) +1 And you\'ll stay waiting --- reporter ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 21:20:45 ) ( 444 bytes ) +1 Interesting --- premie_spouse ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 23:47:17 ) ( 872 bytes ) +1 Interesting --- reporter ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:05:02 ) ( 547 bytes ) +1 Nice try --- premie_spouse ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 11:12:05 ) ( 1058 bytes ) +1 Re: I agree with Reporter --- Andries ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 13:41:53 ) ( 321 bytes ) +1 Worth my while? --- Danny ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 14:49:33 ) ( 926 bytes ) Re: It hasn't been the same techniques --- paddy ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 19:35:04 ) ( 1170 bytes ) +2 New depths of revisionism --- reporter ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 21:30:44 ) ( 320 bytes ) +1 Re: New depths of revisionism --- paddy ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 23:17:59 ) ( 949 bytes ) +1 New depths of rudeness --- reporter ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 23:32:05 ) ( 83 bytes ) +2 Re: Au contraire --- paddy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 00:57:45 ) ( 757 bytes ) Reporter, Paddy is correct --- JHB ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:01:30 ) ( 843 bytes ) +1 Paddy and JHB are both wrong --- reporter ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:27:18 ) ( 715 bytes ) +3 So how did Rawat make that mistake? --- JHB ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 02:42:04 ) ( 1176 bytes ) +2 Yes, a ridiculous master that is...... --- toby ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 02:49:00 ) ( 178 bytes ) +1 And after years of pressing eyeballs.... --- 13 ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 03:11:45 ) ( 588 bytes ) Re: So how did Rawat make that mistake? --- jonx ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 03:25:27 ) ( 688 bytes ) +2 So he did change things, then, as has been claimed --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 05:43:20 ) ( 166 bytes ) +2 Re: So he did change things, then, as has been claimed --- Jethro ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 06:17:59 ) ( 293 bytes ) no need to talk to reporter/jonx, just read EV webpages (no text) --- toby ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 06:21:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) Jon, don't be such an idiot! --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 10, 2005, 16:46:51 ) ( 1690 bytes ) Paddy and JHB are both absolutely right and surely you know it ,Reporter --- Lexy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 15:46:45 ) ( 2193 bytes ) Re: Rawat didn't teach the techniques --- paddy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 16:23:04 ) ( 1784 bytes ) Music technique was changed too --- Karen K ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 09:18:17 ) ( 167 bytes ) Re: Three answers --- koeeaddi ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 21:00:53 ) ( 1914 bytes ) +1 Last but not least. --- reporter ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 21:46:16 ) ( 713 bytes ) +2 Re: Last but not least. --- koeeaddi ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:10:47 ) ( 1253 bytes ) Sacrifice? You've gotta be kidding --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 05:49:36 ) ( 352 bytes ) Re: Three answers --- Andries ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 12:03:01 ) ( 1896 bytes ) link +1 Re: Three answers --- PatD ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 15:08:29 ) ( 1182 bytes ) +1 Re: OT Lane had to lump Mother Theresa and Fakir Chand together --- Andries ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 15:15:45 ) ( 742 bytes ) +1 I guess I'm just an unreconstructed ethnocentrist (nt) (no text) --- PatD ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 16:19:51 ) ( 0 bytes )