New depths of revisionism
Re: Re: It hasn't been the same techniques -- paddy	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: reporter ® 10/08/2005, 21:30:44 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

The techiniques are the same, it is your interpretation that is wrong (again). The light technique is the same - it has always involved gentle pressure. The breath technique is the same - just simplified. The nectar technique is the same - the behind the uvula was a premie invention. The sound technique is the same.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: New depths of revisionism --- paddy ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 23:17:59 ) ( 949 bytes ) +1 New depths of rudeness --- reporter ( Sat, Oct 08, 2005, 23:32:05 ) ( 83 bytes ) +2 Re: Au contraire --- paddy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 00:57:45 ) ( 757 bytes ) Reporter, Paddy is correct --- JHB ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:01:30 ) ( 843 bytes ) +1 Paddy and JHB are both wrong --- reporter ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 01:27:18 ) ( 715 bytes ) +3 So how did Rawat make that mistake? --- JHB ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 02:42:04 ) ( 1176 bytes ) +2 Yes, a ridiculous master that is...... --- toby ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 02:49:00 ) ( 178 bytes ) +1 And after years of pressing eyeballs.... --- 13 ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 03:11:45 ) ( 588 bytes ) Re: So how did Rawat make that mistake? --- jonx ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 03:25:27 ) ( 688 bytes ) +2 So he did change things, then, as has been claimed --- Neville B ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 05:43:20 ) ( 166 bytes ) +2 Re: So he did change things, then, as has been claimed --- Jethro ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 06:17:59 ) ( 293 bytes ) no need to talk to reporter/jonx, just read EV webpages (no text) --- toby ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 06:21:37 ) ( 0 bytes ) Jon, don't be such an idiot! --- JHB ( Mon, Oct 10, 2005, 16:46:51 ) ( 1690 bytes ) Paddy and JHB are both absolutely right and surely you know it ,Reporter --- Lexy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 15:46:45 ) ( 2193 bytes ) Re: Rawat didn't teach the techniques --- paddy ( Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 16:23:04 ) ( 1784 bytes )