|
|
|
A tautologous statement is not a grammatical error, though you may not like its use. I assure you that nothing I said was said in arrogance. Likewise, I was unaware of "going on the attack", though if it seems that way to you, I apologize. I believe the discussion started on whether or not Rawat has changed what he has said over the past 40 years. The evidence that he has changed many things is overwhelming. There's nothing else to discuss regarding that. I suppose that is why you switched to arguing points of English grammar. If you prefer to discuss grammar, lets find a forum for that; I'm sure one must exist on the web somewhere. Discussions about Rawat with you go nowhere. I tire of having to deal with your constant attempts to change the focus of the discussion from the topic at hand to something else. It's a great tactic you use, very effective. It's not very helpful in these discussions about Rawat, though, is it? That is the purpose of the forum, I believe, not correcting what one perceives as errors in the posts of others?
Modified by premie_spouse at Sun, Oct 09, 2005, 11:12:26
|
