Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure
Re: Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure -- yadot1	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Andries ® 01/15/2005, 18:15:25 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I think it is ridiculous and insulting to say that Jan van der Lans must have been biased, only because of his slightly critical remarks of the DLM. And the internationally respected professor in the psychology of religion could certainly understand initiation. I repeat, I have read the book: it is not biased, nor catholic, nor anti-cult. I feel a bit hurt in my national pride by your remarks, as if Dutch scholars cannot do sound research. I have never received Knowledge. Andries Related link: http://www.psychwww.com/psyrelig/obits/vanderlans.html Modified by Andries at Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 18:17:06

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Cynthia ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 20:22:03 ) ( 207 bytes ) Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- yadot1 ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 23:21:59 ) ( 468 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Andries ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 02:55:43 ) ( 257 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 11:27:35 ) ( 90 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Toby ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 11:48:46 ) ( 299 bytes ) +1 Cult experience - LOL! --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:09:36 ) ( 403 bytes ) +2 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- Toby ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:32:39 ) ( 353 bytes ) +1 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 16:26:29 ) ( 375 bytes ) +1 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 00:32:50 ) ( 456 bytes ) Systematic deception justifies the word "victim" & reliable wit... --- Andries ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:38:42 ) ( 984 bytes ) +1 Don't forget the likelihood, though, Andries --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 14:16:10 ) ( 773 bytes ) +1 Reasons --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 18:43:42 ) ( 1292 bytes ) +3 Re: Reasons --- Dermot M ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 18:57:10 ) ( 226 bytes ) No, you've got that backwards --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 20:01:30 ) ( 222 bytes ) +1 Now hold on a darned minute Jim --- jonx ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:36:43 ) ( 190 bytes ) Re: Reasons for --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 11:11:45 ) ( 1337 bytes ) +2 Re: Reasons for --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 11:20:38 ) ( 4336 bytes ) +4 And the reference is - --- NikW ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:01:59 ) ( 404 bytes ) link Re: Reasons for --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:13:54 ) ( 919 bytes ) Comments to Bryan Ronald Wilson's article --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 13:18:14 ) ( 5956 bytes ) +1 Your comments --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:34:56 ) ( 2088 bytes ) +3 Re: Premie divorce --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:53:33 ) ( 499 bytes ) Re: Your comments --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:08:50 ) ( 1772 bytes ) Hey Ya.one --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:33:27 ) ( 3275 bytes ) Re: Failures of Bryanism --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:38:15 ) ( 2947 bytes ) +1 Re: Failures of Bryanism --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:04:34 ) ( 1181 bytes ) +2 The fingers of three hands, you say? --- cq ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:34:41 ) ( 146 bytes ) +1 Re: The fingers of three hands, you say? --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:09:51 ) ( 8 bytes ) +1 You waiting for two fingers of one hand then? (no text) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 16:14:21 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Failures of Bryanism --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:25:52 ) ( 2719 bytes ) +1 if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:10:18 ) ( 1543 bytes ) +2 Re: if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- Pat W ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 05:44:34 ) ( 5343 bytes ) +1 Re: if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- gerry ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 10:40:20 ) ( 639 bytes ) Re: freedom to love, freedom to feel. --- creativejani ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 19:29:25 ) ( 1044 bytes ) Bryan Ronald Wilson --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:27:45 ) ( 1665 bytes ) +1 Re: Bryan Ronald Wilson, very true what you wrote, I believe (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 13:25:58 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Very true in one way --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:00:46 ) ( 746 bytes ) +1 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:15:36 ) ( 1186 bytes ) +3 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:35:59 ) ( 25 bytes ) +1 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:55:05 ) ( 65 bytes ) Re: Andries - have another think --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:49:22 ) ( 1028 bytes ) +2 Paddy, Please read private message (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:52:20 ) ( 0 bytes ) NRMs and cults: potentially harmful combinations of intensity and unpredictab... --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:13:19 ) ( 380 bytes ) If we are all liars then Ya One is a Cult Apologist too-Read this and don't w... --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:54:14 ) ( 9773 bytes ) link +1 check your sources LOL! --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:06:45 ) ( 1269 bytes ) link +2 What's even funnier --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:53:18 ) ( 781 bytes ) So your source was a Scientology site? Also LOL --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:03:14 ) ( 273 bytes ) +1 Re: So your source was a Scientology site? Also LOL --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:19:19 ) ( 474 bytes )