Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure
Re: Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure -- Andries	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: yadot1 ® 01/15/2005, 17:12:27 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

the isbn you quoted does not exist, and having not read this book I cannot say. But you say that he was a religious Christian person and that wrote the book for a Catholic center, then appying Ockahm's razon we should argue: - He was against any other type of religious experience that was not Catholic - In his domain of understanding, his ability to comprehend a phenomenon such as "initiation" was somewhat biased. When you received Knowledge, did you had a feeling of zeal? I didn't. I just walked into a room full of shooless strange people, following my friend, and bang, bang, bang, bang, received K there and then! Those were good times! _Ya.1

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Andries ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 18:15:25 ) ( 489 bytes ) link +2 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Cynthia ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 20:22:03 ) ( 207 bytes ) Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- yadot1 ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 23:21:59 ) ( 468 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Andries ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 02:55:43 ) ( 257 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 11:27:35 ) ( 90 bytes ) +1 Re: Dr. van der Lans: fanatical zeal through DLM's initiation procedure --- Toby ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 11:48:46 ) ( 299 bytes ) +1 Cult experience - LOL! --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:09:36 ) ( 403 bytes ) +2 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- Toby ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:32:39 ) ( 353 bytes ) +1 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 16:26:29 ) ( 375 bytes ) +1 Re: Cult experience - LOL! --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 00:32:50 ) ( 456 bytes ) Systematic deception justifies the word "victim" & reliable wit... --- Andries ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 13:38:42 ) ( 984 bytes ) +1 Don't forget the likelihood, though, Andries --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 14:16:10 ) ( 773 bytes ) +1 Reasons --- yadot1 ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 18:43:42 ) ( 1292 bytes ) +3 Re: Reasons --- Dermot M ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 18:57:10 ) ( 226 bytes ) No, you've got that backwards --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 20:01:30 ) ( 222 bytes ) +1 Now hold on a darned minute Jim --- jonx ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:36:43 ) ( 190 bytes ) Re: Reasons for --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 11:11:45 ) ( 1337 bytes ) +2 Re: Reasons for --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 11:20:38 ) ( 4336 bytes ) +4 And the reference is - --- NikW ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:01:59 ) ( 404 bytes ) link Re: Reasons for --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:13:54 ) ( 919 bytes ) Comments to Bryan Ronald Wilson's article --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 13:18:14 ) ( 5956 bytes ) +1 Your comments --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:34:56 ) ( 2088 bytes ) +3 Re: Premie divorce --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:53:33 ) ( 499 bytes ) Re: Your comments --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:08:50 ) ( 1772 bytes ) Hey Ya.one --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:33:27 ) ( 3275 bytes ) Re: Failures of Bryanism --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:38:15 ) ( 2947 bytes ) +1 Re: Failures of Bryanism --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:04:34 ) ( 1181 bytes ) +2 The fingers of three hands, you say? --- cq ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:34:41 ) ( 146 bytes ) +1 Re: The fingers of three hands, you say? --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:09:51 ) ( 8 bytes ) +1 You waiting for two fingers of one hand then? (no text) --- cq ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 16:14:21 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Failures of Bryanism --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:25:52 ) ( 2719 bytes ) +1 if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:10:18 ) ( 1543 bytes ) +2 Re: if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- Pat W ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 05:44:34 ) ( 5343 bytes ) +1 Re: if you don't help them, you are an accomplice to their dysfunction. --- gerry ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 10:40:20 ) ( 639 bytes ) Re: freedom to love, freedom to feel. --- creativejani ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 19:29:25 ) ( 1044 bytes ) Bryan Ronald Wilson --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 12:27:45 ) ( 1665 bytes ) +1 Re: Bryan Ronald Wilson, very true what you wrote, I believe (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 13:25:58 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Very true in one way --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:00:46 ) ( 746 bytes ) +1 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:15:36 ) ( 1186 bytes ) +3 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:35:59 ) ( 25 bytes ) +1 Re: I feel very upset by such general statements --- Toby ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:55:05 ) ( 65 bytes ) Re: Andries - have another think --- Paddy ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:49:22 ) ( 1028 bytes ) +2 Paddy, Please read private message (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 15:52:20 ) ( 0 bytes ) NRMs and cults: potentially harmful combinations of intensity and unpredictab... --- Andries ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 16:13:19 ) ( 380 bytes ) If we are all liars then Ya One is a Cult Apologist too-Read this and don't w... --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 14:54:14 ) ( 9773 bytes ) link +1 check your sources LOL! --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:06:45 ) ( 1269 bytes ) link +2 What's even funnier --- Dermot M ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:53:18 ) ( 781 bytes ) So your source was a Scientology site? Also LOL --- Pat W ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:03:14 ) ( 273 bytes ) +1 Re: So your source was a Scientology site? Also LOL --- yadot1 ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 18:19:19 ) ( 474 bytes )