The unlit match
Re: The Unlit Match argument -- Babaluji	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Mike Finch ® 01/10/2005, 13:04:40 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I am clearly an unlit match. Yet I gave Knowledge to many people as an instructor, with Maharaji's blessing, as well other 'delicate' (shall we say) assignments directly on his behalf and with his agya. Does this mean that all the premies now practising, who I gave K to, are unlit matches too? Or is M's grace so powerful that his grace can pass through an unlit match instructor to create a lit match premie? I have recently been having an email thread with a premie family to whom I gave K, and who are freaked out that I am now an ex. Should I email them to say that unfortunately as a consequence they are in fact unlit matches themselves, and never 'really' got K? Since he is all-knowing, he must have known at the time that I was an unlit match. And it is even stranger - I did not actually apply to be an instructor, he asked me to be one; and he even kept me on after all the others had been suspended (1990/91). Is this his unfathomable lila ? Asking humbly for guidance and clarity on this issue... -- Mike Modified by Mike Finch at Mon, Jan 10, 2005, 14:10:44

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: The unlit match --- lesley ( Mon, Jan 10, 2005, 15:12:06 ) ( 1068 bytes ) Re: The unlit match --- jonx ( Mon, Jan 10, 2005, 19:13:27 ) ( 293 bytes ) +2 If he's so confused, why don't you help him out, Jonx? --- Jim ( Mon, Jan 10, 2005, 20:02:46 ) ( 2119 bytes ) +1 And can I use you as my role model? --- jonx ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:12:27 ) ( 143 bytes ) +1 No, unlike Rawat I'm VERY imperfect --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:23:32 ) ( 915 bytes ) +1 That's no excuse for your behaviour --- jonx ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:40:57 ) ( 326 bytes ) +1 If you're sincere, prove it --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:52:56 ) ( 253 bytes ) +2 I have nothing to prove to you --- jonx ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 18:03:12 ) ( 269 bytes ) +1 So then you admit you're not sincere -- interesting --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 18:16:38 ) ( 301 bytes ) +1 Not to you mate --- jonx ( Wed, Jan 12, 2005, 12:26:56 ) ( 45 bytes ) +1 But that's not what you said, Jonx --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 12, 2005, 12:53:59 ) ( 332 bytes ) +1 Then let me clarify... --- jonx ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 16:31:47 ) ( 997 bytes ) +1 Don't blame me if you can't be trusted to speak honestly --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 19:05:38 ) ( 1051 bytes ) +1 Forget about your chess game and just get on with the discussion --- jonx ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 06:01:55 ) ( 727 bytes ) +1 Interesting example of your morality, Jon --- JHB ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 06:21:37 ) ( 791 bytes ) +1 How childish! --- jonx ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 17:23:10 ) ( 619 bytes ) +1 Re: How childish! --- JHB ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 00:48:23 ) ( 318 bytes ) What about my question to you below re; fear --- jonx ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 18:06:04 ) ( 60 bytes ) +1 Re: What about my question to you below re; fear --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 18:18:11 ) ( 232 bytes ) +2 Re: What about my question to you below re; fear --- jonx ( Wed, Jan 12, 2005, 12:29:56 ) ( 149 bytes ) +1 That really hurt my feelings ...... --- Jim ( Wed, Jan 12, 2005, 16:20:50 ) ( 30 bytes ) I take it back --- jonx ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 17:09:39 ) ( 927 bytes ) +1 My comments are that that's one of the stupidest things I've heard --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 19:07:33 ) ( 173 bytes ) A couple of points, Jonx... --- Mike Finch ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 03:51:21 ) ( 719 bytes ) +1 Re: A couple of points, Jonx... --- jonx ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:27:13 ) ( 970 bytes ) +2 Jonx! What the hell you talkin', boy?! --- Jim ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 17:35:43 ) ( 390 bytes ) Why do you stay anonymous? --- Mike Finch ( Wed, Jan 12, 2005, 04:12:23 ) ( 2062 bytes ) +2 You seem to have him ID'd Mike -- Jonx he has flown the coop. (no text) --- Joe ( Thu, Jan 13, 2005, 18:10:48 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Why do you stay anonymous? --- jonx ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 16:54:01 ) ( 1137 bytes ) +2 What a stupid reasoning process! --- Jim ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 19:41:59 ) ( 1373 bytes ) +1 Your trigger-happy criticism minimizes its relevance --- jonx ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 06:15:14 ) ( 2686 bytes ) +1 In fact, Jonx, you can't ever know if even YOU have "understanding" --- Jim ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 11:34:48 ) ( 1262 bytes ) Why do you stay anonymous? My question stands... --- Mike Finch ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 09:40:07 ) ( 2430 bytes ) Mike, I certainly did think of you as one the ultimate unlits matches --- Babaluji ( Mon, Jan 10, 2005, 19:22:36 ) ( 42 bytes ) img +1 Something else you didn't realise after 25 years Babaluji..... --- Bunny ( Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 09:18:44 ) ( 605 bytes )