Jonx,

Not only are you admitting that you can't ever know if someone else has "understanding" as it's always possible for that person to one day oppose Rawat and thus, according to you, prove that they never really understood him, but by your very own reasoning, you can't even know if YOU have "understanding" as, you must admit, it's always possible that you'll be the next person to turn on your Master.  Don't say otherwise because that's a point that Rawat himself has made so many times:  you never really know who's next.

So if all the people who oppose Rawat never understood him and, of those still following him, yourself included, you can never tell, doesn't this whole notion of "understanding" become a bit too vague and ephemeral to mean anything?  Sounds more like a euphemism for "loyalty" or something.  Except, of course, it's not that at all. 

I dunno, Jonx, I'd say that you're stuck in some very meaningless cult jargon and buzzwords.  Unless, of course, you can help me understand this better.  But then that's not real understanding either, is it? No, understanding's something else altogether ....

LOL!!!