Does Anybody Really know What Time It Is?
Re: Re: Did We Have Choice? Of course! -- Flywithoutwings	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: paddy ® 09/11/2005, 21:49:05 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

or who they really are? But I gave up thinking about that a long time ago. Leading on to your next post you contrast Rawat with Rajneesh and I think you do Rawat a disservice here. He was after all a little boy when he was proclaimed LOTU and you would have had to be a very unusual person not to let all that go to your head though I certainly aren't trying to excuse his shallow and venal behaviour once he got the chance to indulge. But Rajneesh was a very much more intelligent person than Rawat and took on his self-appointed Bhagwan role as an adult. I think you'd have to say he deserves more bad karma than Rawat.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Almost lunchtime at The Oval --- Flywithoutwings ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 05:40:54 ) ( 1806 bytes ) Re: Does Anybody Really know What Time It Is? --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 06:15:57 ) ( 1275 bytes ) +2 INTERESTING, who is paddy... lol --- Henna ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 11:50:49 ) ( 425 bytes ) +1 Re: INTERESTING, who is paddy... lol --- paddy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 17:58:48 ) ( 343 bytes ) +1 here's one --- dant ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 10:24:23 ) ( 157 bytes ) +1 Re: here's one but it's about premies not ex-premies --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:22:32 ) ( 35 bytes ) +1 how about addressing the issue first --- dant ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 06:29:50 ) ( 31 bytes ) Re: Does Anybody Really know What Time It Is? --- paddy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 17:52:47 ) ( 1460 bytes ) +1 Paddy,when you say naughty, bad things about the guru.... --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 18:26:24 ) ( 314 bytes ) +1 Re: Can suggestions be masterful? --- paddy ( Mon, Sep 12, 2005, 19:27:05 ) ( 814 bytes ) +1 But Paddy, did you think Rawat was the Satguru? --- JHB ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 00:10:31 ) ( 224 bytes ) +1 Re: But Paddy, did you think Rawat was the Satguru? --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 03:25:59 ) ( 562 bytes ) +1 Good grief Paddy! --- T ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 05:16:33 ) ( 1362 bytes ) +1 Re: au contraire --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 05:41:52 ) ( 1282 bytes ) +1 your post proves the point --- dant ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 10:19:37 ) ( 489 bytes ) +1 Re: She was not talking about her experience --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:34:12 ) ( 721 bytes ) +3 Re: She was not talking about her experience --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:47:04 ) ( 263 bytes ) +1 You were just thinking through an idea - As was I (no text) --- paddy ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 02:51:12 ) ( 0 bytes ) Yes I actually read the posts --- dant ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 06:28:41 ) ( 452 bytes ) +1 I 'm actually often wrong --- paddy ( Thu, Sep 15, 2005, 19:08:52 ) ( 714 bytes ) +1 do you actually read your own posts? --- dant ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 01:19:23 ) ( 1449 bytes ) +1 Re: do you actually read your own posts? --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 17:36:09 ) ( 1638 bytes ) +1 Paddy, read Lexy again --- JHB ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 19:43:20 ) ( 337 bytes ) Re: I side with Lexy: One cannot choose to believe but one can choose to inv... --- Andries ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 17:18:08 ) ( 747 bytes )