I quote you again here for convenience and made bold the part in question so you won't have a hard time finding what you wrote:'It seems that my posts have a certain similarity. An ex-premie posts a sweeping statement about how black everything was and is in Rawatism and I respond. I think in this case Lexy was saying she had no choice in becoming involved in DLM. I find it a little disquieting to receive such anger from others who quite often are complaining about how they think I feel rather than what I say. Now they are saying I was never a "real" premie cause I enjoyed myself in Rawatism so how can I know what it was "really" like. It's also particularly weird how many times people claim I must be a troll.'
Now please tell me what is unconvincing about that and while your at it you might do the same for what I said in the other post above in this thread where you said something equally unjustifiable to Henna.
Paddy I don't "attack" you because I don't agree with your opinion. There are many opinions on this forum that I don't agree with. I just can't stand bullpoop. Call it my pet peeve if you will.
Suggesting that I don't read the posts I respond to is insulting and a completely absurd defense in this case, but I I doubt you will apologise or admit your error and that is why I think my comment about your "heel digging" accurate and not a cheap insult like your comment was. So who is doing the attacking then?
