Re: But Paddy, did you think Rawat was the Satguru?
Re: But Paddy, did you think Rawat was the Satguru? -- JHB	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: paddy ® 09/13/2005, 03:25:59 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I thought very little of and about Rawat. He said "Accept my Knowledge, don't accept me" and I was prepared to take him at his word. Was he the Satguru? Time would tell and it did and in the meantime I just practised ss&m as well as I could and let God worry about the details and trust Grace would shower down upon me. Seemed to work out pretty well. Really your misunderstanding is encapsulated in your question "Did you THINK Rawat was the Satguru". It wasn't about thinking, it was about experiencing. PS In retrospect this was all just concepts of course.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Good grief Paddy! --- T ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 05:16:33 ) ( 1362 bytes ) +1 Re: au contraire --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 05:41:52 ) ( 1282 bytes ) +1 your post proves the point --- dant ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 10:19:37 ) ( 489 bytes ) +1 Re: She was not talking about her experience --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:34:12 ) ( 721 bytes ) +3 Re: She was not talking about her experience --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:47:04 ) ( 263 bytes ) +1 You were just thinking through an idea - As was I (no text) --- paddy ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 02:51:12 ) ( 0 bytes ) Yes I actually read the posts --- dant ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 06:28:41 ) ( 452 bytes ) +1 I 'm actually often wrong --- paddy ( Thu, Sep 15, 2005, 19:08:52 ) ( 714 bytes ) +1 do you actually read your own posts? --- dant ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 01:19:23 ) ( 1449 bytes ) +1 Re: do you actually read your own posts? --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 17:36:09 ) ( 1638 bytes ) +1 Paddy, read Lexy again --- JHB ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 19:43:20 ) ( 337 bytes ) Re: I side with Lexy: One cannot choose to believe but one can choose to inv... --- Andries ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 17:18:08 ) ( 747 bytes )