your post proves the point

your post proves the point
Re: Re: au contraire -- paddy	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
dant ^Ž

09/13/2005, 10:19:37
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

you said, "I think in this case Lexy was saying she had no choice in becoming involved in DLM." That is exactly what got me annoyed about your post. She said SHE had no choice in becoming involved. You were the one who started generalising.

For example:

"I don't just suggest we had a choice. I am stating it overtly and unequivocally."

"Premies today are little more than a fan club that Rawat uses for his personal ends."

Just to grab the first two I see. Paddy your slip is showing.

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

Re: She was not talking about her experience --- paddy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:34:12 ) ( 721 bytes ) +3

Re: She was not talking about her experience --- Lexy ( Tue, Sep 13, 2005, 17:47:04 ) ( 263 bytes ) +1

You were just thinking through an idea - As was I (no text) --- paddy ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 02:51:12 ) ( 0 bytes )

Yes I actually read the posts --- dant ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 06:28:41 ) ( 452 bytes ) +1

I 'm actually often wrong --- paddy ( Thu, Sep 15, 2005, 19:08:52 ) ( 714 bytes ) +1

do you actually read your own posts? --- dant ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 01:19:23 ) ( 1449 bytes ) +1

Re: do you actually read your own posts? --- paddy ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 17:36:09 ) ( 1638 bytes ) +1

Paddy, read Lexy again --- JHB ( Fri, Sep 16, 2005, 19:43:20 ) ( 337 bytes )

Re: I side with Lexy: One cannot choose to believe but one can choose to inv... --- Andries ( Wed, Sep 14, 2005, 17:18:08 ) ( 747 bytes )