And .....
Re: Read it again -- Henna	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: check ® 04/03/2005, 15:25:44 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

No one denies Prem Rawat has also been Guru Maharaj Ji. But what many Exes do, either in ignorance or deliberately, is claim Prem Rawat is talking about himself when he is obviously talking about his father or the role of Guru Maharaj Ji. Remember, he was a devotee of his Guru Maharaj Ji and what he says about Guru Maharaj Ji is based on his own experience and his perception of his teacher. When he says "Guru Maharaj Ji is that saviour", that is his opinion of his Guru Maharaj Ji, as is confirmed by the following words "and WE have to have that trust, and WE have to have that faith". For 20 years after his Guru Maharaj Ji died, Prem Rawat never spoke at an event without a picture of his Guru above his head. Even today, more than 40 years later Prem Rawat still has a picture of his guru above him when he talks in India. There's an old saying - to become a teacher, first become a student. Prem Rawat was a devotee long before he became a guru.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Long before? He was 8 years old! --- Bunny ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 16:13:29 ) ( 473 bytes ) +1 Sharpen your pencil Bunny. --- check ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 18:49:22 ) ( 860 bytes ) +4 Re: Sharpen your pencil Bunny. --- gerry ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 19:17:13 ) ( 1751 bytes ) +2 Perfect, Gerry! Notice he, once again, is unable to respond. --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 11:39:25 ) ( 1388 bytes ) +1 Thanks, NAR I was beginning to thoink I was invisible --- gerry ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 11:53:21 ) ( 247 bytes ) +1 Very visible, of late, Gerry! --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 12:03:07 ) ( 770 bytes ) +1 You and Patty--a couple of late blooming geniuses (OT) --- gerry ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 13:00:14 ) ( 266 bytes ) +1 Re: You and Patty--a couple of late blooming geniuses (OT) --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 13:16:58 ) ( 412 bytes ) +1 Meanwhile, I'm stuck whistling this tune... --- gerry ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 13:19:20 ) ( 0 bytes ) link +1 Ahhhh, but you DO have one! --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 13:46:02 ) ( 359 bytes ) Just for you Gerry --- check ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 18:07:29 ) ( 2250 bytes ) +1 Thanks for that, Check, you are A-OK --- gerry ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 18:34:09 ) ( 655 bytes ) Re: Sharpen your pencil Bunny. --- paddy ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 22:36:06 ) ( 1782 bytes ) +2 Right on, Paddy! --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 11:43:40 ) ( 424 bytes ) "Check" is tongue-tied, apparently. --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 12:25:21 ) ( 468 bytes ) +1 His full name is: Polecat Skullstuffing! LOL!(nt) (no text) --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 12:36:47 ) ( 0 bytes ) Check, only a cult member would consider that you had a sharp pencil! --- Bunny ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 14:22:18 ) ( 841 bytes ) +1 No preconceived notions, there Bunny (LOL) --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 14:32:15 ) ( 715 bytes ) Here's a suggestion, Check --- Candy ( Tue, Apr 05, 2005, 02:55:35 ) ( 771 bytes ) What difference does it make? --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 16:44:17 ) ( 784 bytes ) +2 Re: What difference does it make? --- Cynthia ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 17:53:37 ) ( 1375 bytes ) +1 Re: What difference does it make? --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 10:12:34 ) ( 1441 bytes ) It makes a huge difference! --- check ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 19:04:37 ) ( 605 bytes ) +3 Oh pluuuuuuueeeeeeezzze check! --- Johnny Ex ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 20:20:34 ) ( 105 bytes ) link +1 Re: Oh pluuuuuuueeeeeeezzze check! --- check ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 07:11:08 ) ( 375 bytes ) +2 Re: Oh pluuuuuuueeeeeeezzze check! --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 11:11:31 ) ( 1599 bytes ) link Re: Oh pluuuuuuueeeeeeezzze check! --- Johnny Ex ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 20:23:42 ) ( 3254 bytes ) No, you're absolutely wrong... --- Cynthia ( Sun, Apr 03, 2005, 23:31:44 ) ( 1803 bytes ) +2 Clarification --- check ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 07:05:00 ) ( 900 bytes ) +1 Re: Clarification --- Cynthia ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 09:20:09 ) ( 1691 bytes ) +1 The succession --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 10:54:46 ) ( 772 bytes ) Re: No, you're absolutely wrong... --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 10:45:39 ) ( 668 bytes ) Frayed knot. --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 10:35:54 ) ( 1191 bytes ) +1 Re: Frayed knot. --- PatD ( Mon, Apr 04, 2005, 20:22:16 ) ( 346 bytes ) +1 Re: Frayed knot. --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Tue, Apr 05, 2005, 04:45:18 ) ( 3583 bytes ) +1 Still, it stings doesn't it? --- PatD ( Tue, Apr 05, 2005, 15:53:26 ) ( 441 bytes ) nope, you cannot change history. --- Henna ( Tue, Apr 05, 2005, 13:26:19 ) ( 27 bytes )