You seem to have missed the point.
This thread is about Hilltop incorrectly suggesting in the topic that the satsang suggests the Prem Rawat is saying "Prem Rawat is that saviour", when Prem Rawat is clearly refering to his Guru when he say "Guru Maharaj JI is that saviour".

The fact that he routinely refers to himself as the "Creator in Human Form" or some such obviously has some bearing on his use of similar language in the instant case, since you so rightly point out that in this specific case his meaning is open to some interpretation. Moreover, are you conceding the point that he claimed to be "Creator in Human Form?" That would be the straightforward interpretation of your decision not to limit the conversation to this one speech.

My point being that ex premies either in ignorance or dishonestly misrepresent what is being said.

If that's your point you haven't made it. At most you could claim that a pure textual analysis of this particular speech leaves the question of his claim open, but his overall behavior and the evidence of the bulk of his other speeches, closes the loop. Just who is he refering to in this speech? Even if you claim he's talking about his father: 1. That's a lie, all on its own; and 2. He claims to be his father's successor, which means that what's true of his father is also true of him.