Sorry to jump in here
Re: There you go again -- Neville B	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Eileen ® 02/07/2005, 12:58:34 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I just wanted to say that I don't see where you get the idea that premies think they are superior to exes. It seems the other way around to me. From what I've seen here, premies try to engage in a discussion and are immediately attacked, some arguing back & forth goes on, and then the premie leaves. There is only so much bickering that can go on, and then we move on. Premies & ex-premies are never going to agree. I have alot of former premie friends who are no longer involved with maharaji or knowledge - but we've remaied friends. We just don't discuss it. We're raising kids & living our lives and respect each other for whatever direction our lives are taking us. Neither of us feels superior to the other. They don't have to remind me everyday that I am a mindless, immoral cult member. They have simply moved on and never discuss maharaji at all, at least not with me. What I don't understand about the hard core exes is that some of you have left 5, 10, 15 years ago and are still posting here everyday - 10-15 posts a day. I'm sure you all know that discussing maharaji and your anger everyday can't be very healthy. I know that this is none of my business, but you made the comment of being locked in a "spiritual adolescence." Everyday we are alive allows us constant growth, no matter what path we are on - but if you say you've moved on - it really doesn't seem like it to an outsider.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Then what are you doing here, Eileen? --- Jim ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 13:51:55 ) ( 816 bytes ) +2 RIGHT: Thanks to forums, EPO I left the cult --- SilviaB ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 00:19:16 ) ( 840 bytes ) Re: Then what are you doing here, Eileen? --- Eileen ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 02:25:16 ) ( 62 bytes ) Er, sorry to jump in here Eileen --- Dermot M ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 14:21:59 ) ( 1204 bytes ) +2 Er, sorry to jump in here, Dermot --- Jonathan ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 16:42:56 ) ( 883 bytes ) +2 Wow (no text) --- Neville B ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 17:30:47 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Er, sorry to jump in here, Dermot --- Eileen ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 02:22:21 ) ( 215 bytes ) +1 Er, sorry to jump in here, Eileen --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 08:24:15 ) ( 1498 bytes ) +3 You've written some amazing, incisive posts, Jonathan (no text) --- Neville B ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 09:19:08 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Mutual, Neville! (plus, I need to make up for past indiscretions....) (no text) --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 09:49:07 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Er, sorry to jump in here, Jonathan --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 09:45:37 ) ( 4955 bytes ) link +1 Er, sorry to jump in here, Cynthia! --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 10:09:46 ) ( 849 bytes ) Why don't you go and ask him, Jonathan? (no text) --- Eileen ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 12:23:09 ) ( 0 bytes ) +2 Can you be just a LITTLE more honest with us, Eileen? --- Jim ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 12:42:10 ) ( 665 bytes ) That's Right, Jim! Eileen, Come ON --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 13:23:27 ) ( 2212 bytes ) link +1 Yeah, stupid, insulting, piss-take of a response. Ask him!!!!! (no text) --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 14:23:10 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 I once got a reply from Maharaj Charan Singh --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 14:41:11 ) ( 201 bytes ) +1 Re: I once got a reply from Maharaj Charan Singh --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 14:52:12 ) ( 291 bytes ) +1 Re: I once got a reply from Maharaj Charan Singh --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 16:25:12 ) ( 586 bytes ) +1 Too Funny! Also, Too Sad... --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 17:17:25 ) ( 1995 bytes ) +2 testing (no text) --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 17:58:24 ) ( 0 bytes ) That happened? --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 18:04:00 ) ( 539 bytes ) +1 Thanks, Dermot. It Happened. I Can't Make Up Stuff Like That! (no text) --- Jonathan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 18:08:33 ) ( 0 bytes ) Prem Rawat's answer ~ when questioned about marriage. --- Hilltop ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 23:22:37 ) ( 860 bytes ) Come on, Eileen --- Neville B ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 14:48:16 ) ( 779 bytes ) Re: Sorry to jump in here --- Cynthia ( Mon, Feb 07, 2005, 15:58:39 ) ( 1891 bytes ) +1 Re: Sorry to jump in here --- Eileen ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 02:10:02 ) ( 2445 bytes ) +2 Yeah Eileen --- Dermot M ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 06:00:25 ) ( 949 bytes ) Re: Sorry to jump in here --- Cynthia ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 06:36:59 ) ( 7319 bytes ) +1 Thanks for that perspective, Cynthia. --- Eileen ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 12:51:30 ) ( 118 bytes ) +1 Re: Thanks for that perspective, Cynthia. --- SilviaB ( Wed, Feb 09, 2005, 02:15:57 ) ( 250 bytes ) +1 Re: Thanks for that perspective, Cynthia (edited). --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 09, 2005, 04:55:24 ) ( 4100 bytes ) come on Eileen --- Susan ( Tue, Feb 08, 2005, 02:47:43 ) ( 1961 bytes )