Re: LA Ex wearing dismal coloured glasses
Re: Why do old time premies remain premies? -- Friend of LA EX	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Paddy ® 12/08/2004, 02:15:50 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

LA EX's post is full of intelligence and depth but I think it's way off base. Many premies have been premies for over 30 years. The exciting time in DLM ended nearly 25 years ago, yes it's been relatively boring for that long. After 30 years it would probably take a tidal wave to wash out the rest of the premies. For over 25 years they've been looking at the world through Prem Rawat coloured glasses which only makes the world look a tiny bit different but adds one important dimension, Rawat as Lord. But it doesn't add much of a burden to their lives, billions of people are religious, most of them probably believe many tenets of their religion that are bullshit but it's no big deal. Similarly, you may believe in Rawatism but you go to work everyday, love your family, have hobbies, watch videos, go to occasional events, where's the problem? Why would you leave? It would take a major life event to throw you out of your comfortable routine and then maybe Rawatism would go up in smoke.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

can't support that --- dant ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 03:21:24 ) ( 731 bytes ) +1 Re: can't support that --- Paddy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 14:57:35 ) ( 1258 bytes ) +3 Let me see if I got this correctomundo --- gerry ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 16:14:47 ) ( 342 bytes ) Re: can't support that --- PatD ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 18:27:39 ) ( 1608 bytes ) +1 I'm not sure I agree, Pat --- Neville B ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 14:37:36 ) ( 740 bytes ) +1 You're right Neville --- PatD ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 15:54:16 ) ( 305 bytes ) I agree partly with Paddy --- Tempora ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 06:21:05 ) ( 3887 bytes ) I disagree - premies are still leaving --- JHB ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 05:39:41 ) ( 424 bytes ) +1 Re: I disagree - premies are still leaving --- Paddy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 15:02:08 ) ( 483 bytes ) +1 John may be a "legend" but you're patronizing as all hell --- gerry ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 11:00:37 ) ( 481 bytes ) Re: LA Ex wearing dismal coloured glasses --- NikW ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 09:28:13 ) ( 2128 bytes ) +1 Re: LA Ex wearing dismal coloured glasses --- Paddy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 15:09:11 ) ( 673 bytes ) Partly that's true and partly it isn't true. --- Friend of LA EX ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 12:14:39 ) ( 1892 bytes ) +2 Re: Partly that's true and partly it isn't true. --- Paddy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 14:25:28 ) ( 1434 bytes ) +1 Paddy, I suspect you exited long ago ...... --- JHB ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 16:55:19 ) ( 1246 bytes ) Re: Partly that's true and partly it isn't true. --- bill ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 08:32:09 ) ( 937 bytes ) How come I always seem to disagree with you, Paddy ? --- Lexy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 14:07:23 ) ( 2417 bytes ) +1 Re: How come I always seem to disagree with you, Paddy ? --- Paddy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 14:45:30 ) ( 868 bytes ) +3 Re: How come I always seem to disagree with you, Paddy ? --- Lexy ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 14:54:11 ) ( 51 bytes ) Hey, Paddy... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Dec 08, 2004, 17:17:48 ) ( 754 bytes ) To Paddy..Another Reply.... --- Lexy ( Thu, Dec 09, 2004, 06:16:38 ) ( 2393 bytes )