Re: numbers attending
Re: Re: numbers attending -- NikW	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: d ® 08/25/2005, 12:35:53 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Bingo, here it goes. Right, my Dad said this might happen. Had a huge chat to him just before. Interesting. Very very interesting. The numbers question can never be fully resolved because EV does the counting and also chooses which historical period and geographical location to compare against the present. Ok, so I'm being asked to take both party's views on faith. With Rawat being profoundly unattractive to young people (fat middle aged toad in a suit who describes himself as a successful investor - that sure is going to bring in you young folks !) ... except that what attracted me wasn't the man, it was the message. ie, the idea that peace was not only possible in my life, but that I already had it. There's a viral marketing campaign spreading the idea of knowledge, in case you hadn't noticed. Stick videos on public tv channels at the middle of the night, stick a phone number up, and see what happens. (blogs, albeit on the surface of things severely moderated ones - I've emailed the guy who runs the 'official' blog/'expression' sites to see if he says anything interesting) also online content readily and easily available, wikipedia articles, ex-premie.org itself, as well as dribs and drabs on indymedia, that message can potentially get through regardless. Depending on which camp you sit in, that's either really bad, because more people are going to get caught up in it, or really good, because the message is going to spread. Modified by d at Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 12:59:37

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Rawat in the West is pretty much dead --- Joe ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 13:15:48 ) ( 1252 bytes ) +2 Re: Rawat in the West is pretty much dead --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:01:12 ) ( 122 bytes ) +2 Re: Rawat in the West is pretty much dead --- Joe ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:34:17 ) ( 301 bytes ) Re: Rawat in the West is pretty much dead --- NikW ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 17:05:38 ) ( 1344 bytes ) link +1 Growing in what way? Attendance? --- Henna ( Fri, Aug 26, 2005, 20:28:06 ) ( 910 bytes ) Re: Rawat in the West is pretty much dead --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:03:58 ) ( 142 bytes ) +1 Simplistic and Contradictory --- Joe ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:32:40 ) ( 2364 bytes ) +2 Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:44:28 ) ( 1253 bytes ) +2 Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- Joe ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 14:56:42 ) ( 1954 bytes ) +2 Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:34:24 ) ( 3356 bytes ) +3 Promises premies must make to Rawat --- JHB ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:44:18 ) ( 1235 bytes ) link +1 Re: Promises premies must make to Rawat --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:54:58 ) ( 396 bytes ) +1 Re: Promises premies must make to Rawat --- JHB ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 16:33:23 ) ( 2471 bytes ) Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- Joe ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 16:10:21 ) ( 1739 bytes ) Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- Anna ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 16:53:52 ) ( 914 bytes ) +1 Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- d ( Mon, Sep 05, 2005, 08:30:47 ) ( 586 bytes ) +1 Re: Simplistic and Contradictory --- Lexy ( Mon, Sep 05, 2005, 17:14:57 ) ( 750 bytes ) Contradictory and DANGEROUS --- Henna ( Sun, Aug 28, 2005, 15:04:49 ) ( 1683 bytes ) I strongly disagree --- Jim ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:11:23 ) ( 3096 bytes ) +1 Re: I strongly disagree --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:48:45 ) ( 1653 bytes ) +1 Now you're just "sprackin' shit" as my gf's daughter says --- Jim ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 16:36:53 ) ( 1185 bytes ) +1 Re: Now you're just "sprackin' shit" as my gf's daughter says --- d ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 21:57:04 ) ( 726 bytes ) +1 You need to look that up if you're going to keep using it --- Jim ( Fri, Aug 26, 2005, 09:39:06 ) ( 1030 bytes ) From a slightly different angle re the techniques --- hamzen ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 15:31:01 ) ( 334 bytes ) Re: numbers attending --- NikW ( Thu, Aug 25, 2005, 17:33:37 ) ( 1748 bytes )