Mr. Rawat Should Clear Things Up In Debate
			Forum

Posted by: Hussain ® 03/08/2005, 10:20:50 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Mr. Rawat could easily deal with allegations if he would set up a forum for a debate with former members of Divine Light Mission, and others who have issues with Rawatism, if he is legitimate.  Mr. Rawat could have moderators (both pro and anti Rawat) to keep things in order and provide him a chance to answer questions. I'm sure some premie may read this challenge.  Why does Mr. Rawat (aka. Maharaji, Lord of the Universe, Guru, etc.) refuse to clear things up in a public forum? Maybe some followers of Rawat can bring this to his attention, and try to arrange for it.

Previous

Recommend View All Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Not a chance --- Neville B ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 10:50:34 ) ( 314 bytes ) +1 Ex-premies have been suggesting this for years..... --- Joe ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:13:44 ) ( 745 bytes ) +2 Re: May be, if you first make sure he has a well-paid job as a pilot???? (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:21:07 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 As if Prem Rawat would (or could) actually work at a job. Give me a break. (no text) --- Joe ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:35:16 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Trying to picture him taking orders, failing dismally (no text) --- hamzen ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 12:24:53 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Re: We should open a rehabilitation center for cult leaders --- Andries ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:05:21 ) ( 80 bytes ) +3 There already is one! --- NAR ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 16:20:04 ) ( 589 bytes ) The point is, Andries --- Joe ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 18:45:14 ) ( 583 bytes ) Re: We should open a rehabilitation center for cult leaders --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 00:55:48 ) ( 226 bytes ) +1 Re: I am concerned about a mutually unhealthy guru-disciple relationship (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 09:38:47 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 I have a question Andries... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 15:12:23 ) ( 966 bytes ) link +1 Re: I still do sometimes, but everything has already been said --- Andries ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 15:19:35 ) ( 599 bytes ) +2 Re: I still do sometimes, but everything has already been said --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 17:33:52 ) ( 1112 bytes ) Second-Hand Scholarship Needs First-Hand Accounts --- Jonathan ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 14:11:31 ) ( 382 bytes ) +1 Good point, Jonathan --- Jim ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 14:54:43 ) ( 290 bytes ) +1 Re: Most research is outdated since the internet --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 17:54:12 ) ( 540 bytes ) +1 By the way, Andries, what do you think of NRM academia? --- Jim ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:09:28 ) ( 1009 bytes ) +2 Re: By the way, Andries, what do you think of NRM academia? --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:27:56 ) ( 727 bytes ) Re: The defect of the guru-disciple system (interesting article) --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:44:18 ) ( 0 bytes ) link He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! --- Jean-Michel ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:32:15 ) ( 219 bytes ) +1 Re: He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! --- Hussain ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:10:18 ) ( 530 bytes ) +2 Re: He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! EDIT OF LAST... --- Hussain ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:12:59 ) ( 60 bytes ) What a person who might be "interested" should ask --- Joe ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 14:25:50 ) ( 1870 bytes ) +1 Re: What a person who might be "interested" should ask --- Hussain ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 11:52:55 ) ( 868 bytes ) Re: Mr. Rawat Should Clear Things Up In Debate! LOL! --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 00:33:44 ) ( 1599 bytes )