Ex-premies have been suggesting this for years.....
Re: Not a chance -- Neville B	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Joe ® 03/08/2005, 11:13:44 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

And it has never happened, and Rawat hasn't even acknowledged that there is even a legitimate criticism of him.  That's how out of it, dishonest, and deluded the guy is.  So the whole cult just steams along pretending there never was any problem.  Ex-premies are, of course, this huge elephant in the corner that Rawat and his cult haven't a clue how to deal with.   I have said many times, that I think if Rawat really did admit the problems, and address the criticisms that ex-premies have of him, a lot of the opposition to him would evaporate.  But given who Rawat thinks he is, that is extremely unlikely to ever happen, and it's also the reason his cult is dying (in the West, at least).  Modified by Joe at Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:25:36

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: May be, if you first make sure he has a well-paid job as a pilot???? (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:21:07 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 As if Prem Rawat would (or could) actually work at a job. Give me a break. (no text) --- Joe ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:35:16 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Trying to picture him taking orders, failing dismally (no text) --- hamzen ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 12:24:53 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 Re: We should open a rehabilitation center for cult leaders --- Andries ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:05:21 ) ( 80 bytes ) +3 There already is one! --- NAR ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 16:20:04 ) ( 589 bytes ) The point is, Andries --- Joe ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 18:45:14 ) ( 583 bytes ) Re: We should open a rehabilitation center for cult leaders --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 00:55:48 ) ( 226 bytes ) +1 Re: I am concerned about a mutually unhealthy guru-disciple relationship (NT) (no text) --- Andries ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 09:38:47 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 I have a question Andries... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 15:12:23 ) ( 966 bytes ) link +1 Re: I still do sometimes, but everything has already been said --- Andries ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 15:19:35 ) ( 599 bytes ) +2 Re: I still do sometimes, but everything has already been said --- Cynthia ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 17:33:52 ) ( 1112 bytes ) Second-Hand Scholarship Needs First-Hand Accounts --- Jonathan ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 14:11:31 ) ( 382 bytes ) +1 Good point, Jonathan --- Jim ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 14:54:43 ) ( 290 bytes ) +1 Re: Most research is outdated since the internet --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 17:54:12 ) ( 540 bytes ) +1 By the way, Andries, what do you think of NRM academia? --- Jim ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:09:28 ) ( 1009 bytes ) +2 Re: By the way, Andries, what do you think of NRM academia? --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:27:56 ) ( 727 bytes ) Re: The defect of the guru-disciple system (interesting article) --- Andries ( Fri, Mar 11, 2005, 18:44:18 ) ( 0 bytes ) link He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! --- Jean-Michel ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 11:32:15 ) ( 219 bytes ) +1 Re: He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! --- Hussain ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:10:18 ) ( 530 bytes ) +2 Re: He doesn't want to directly confront even premies anymore !! EDIT OF LAST... --- Hussain ( Tue, Mar 08, 2005, 13:12:59 ) ( 60 bytes ) What a person who might be "interested" should ask --- Joe ( Wed, Mar 09, 2005, 14:25:50 ) ( 1870 bytes ) +1 Re: What a person who might be "interested" should ask --- Hussain ( Thu, Mar 10, 2005, 11:52:55 ) ( 868 bytes )