Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none

Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none
Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by:
lesley ^Ž

04/27/2020, 02:20:11
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin

Post Reply

well Jim, I did make the effort to read it all through - good to see another academic is making a living putting pen to paper but pretty much it read like I am a Trump supporter and oh what was that? yes I am a Trump supporter first and foremost so don't read this as living fact. I mean really. Wasn't that late January call of Trump to close the borders with China about trade not the pandemic? (I seem to remember he was upset about the way his trade dealings were going with them but yes I agree with him, get that tariff wall back up). But the learned professor wants us to think this was an example of Trump's prescience concerning the virus?

Fudging really isn't it.

Savour his wisdom? I don't think so Jim.

Modified by lesley at Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 02:24:48

Current page

Replies to this message

Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none --- Jim ( Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 16:21:17 ) ( 474 bytes ) +1

Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none --- Jim ( Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 09:38:43 ) ( 98 bytes ) +1

Re: The best article on the pandemic I've read bar none --- lesley ( Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 14:13:01 ) ( 2916 bytes ) +1

Weird ........ --- Jim ( Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 14:23:13 ) ( 242 bytes ) +1

huh... --- lesley ( Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 19:51:30 ) ( 1063 bytes ) +2

Re: huh... --- 13 ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 02:50:09 ) ( 871 bytes ) +3

wow --- aunt bea ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 08:29:20 ) ( 197 bytes ) +1

Thanks --- 13 ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 09:05:18 ) ( 34 bytes )

What China did was far worse than that --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:34:20 ) ( 1292 bytes ) link
Re: huh... --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:46:25 ) ( 161 bytes )

You didn't read it --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 11:46:05 ) ( 1358 bytes ) link +1

Re: You didn't read it --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:17:49 ) ( 370 bytes ) +2

PS --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:24:01 ) ( 210 bytes ) +1

Re: PS --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:45:59 ) ( 6 bytes )

Re: You didn't read it --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:45:27 ) ( 2731 bytes ) +1

Re: You didn't read it --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 13:03:39 ) ( 979 bytes ) +1

Re: You didn't read it --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:54:38 ) ( 346 bytes ) +1

sorry to hear that Jim --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 16:49:00 ) ( 79 bytes ) +1

Re: sorry to hear that Jim --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 10:56:02 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1

Re: sorry to hear that Jim --- lesley ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 13:45:52 ) ( 450 bytes ) +1

Why would I believe you? --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 14:24:29 ) ( 599 bytes ) +2

And before you get too self-righteous and indignant about this ... --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 14:26:11 ) ( 73 bytes )
Re: Why would I believe you? --- lesley ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 16:40:27 ) ( 55 bytes ) +1

Re: Why would I believe you? --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 17:26:43 ) ( 129 bytes )