Re: You didn't read it
Re: You didn't read it -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by: lesley ® 04/29/2020, 12:17:49 Author Profile Edit Alert Forum Admin Post Reply

well I have only read the first sentence of this post of yours and I am so annoyed I have not read any more I am here OBJECTING - I said I read the article, I SAID I read the article.  I have never given you cause to think I would lie to you.  And that is something I can know for sure, did I read it or not.  Yes I bloody did.  That is so rude to me, Jim, unacceptable!

Previous

Current page

Next

Replies to this message

PS --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:24:01 ) ( 210 bytes ) +1 Re: PS --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:45:59 ) ( 6 bytes ) Re: You didn't read it --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:45:27 ) ( 2731 bytes ) +1 Re: You didn't read it --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 13:03:39 ) ( 979 bytes ) +1 Re: You didn't read it --- Jim ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:54:38 ) ( 346 bytes ) +1 sorry to hear that Jim --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 16:49:00 ) ( 79 bytes ) +1 Re: sorry to hear that Jim --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 10:56:02 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1 Re: sorry to hear that Jim --- lesley ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 13:45:52 ) ( 450 bytes ) +1 Why would I believe you? --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 14:24:29 ) ( 599 bytes ) +2 And before you get too self-righteous and indignant about this ... --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 14:26:11 ) ( 73 bytes ) Re: Why would I believe you? --- lesley ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 16:40:27 ) ( 55 bytes ) +1 Re: Why would I believe you? --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 17:26:43 ) ( 129 bytes )