Re: In a cult, only the leader can decide who's a good follower
Re: In a cult, only the leader can decide who's a good follower -- Jim	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Steve ® 08/19/2005, 21:46:19 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

You say that you guys thought you were good premies but who the hell cares what you thought?  I honestly didn’t care what other people thought. I thought I had made that clear. If someone thought I was a bad premie (a DUO Director for example) he was full of shit. You were mere human beings.  We were following the Lord and what he said mattered.  And he said ...... He was the Lord and he showed us the experience of Knowledge. Thank you, thank you Lord for showing us that experience. But you weren't good premies if you weren't committed to following Rawat without question. We were good premies because we did our best to stay in “that” experience. We had brownie points for being good premies because in our minds, we were good premies.   I was a good premie because: I did not put off until tomorrow what I could do today I constantly meditated and remembered holy name or at least did my best (and sometimes hash helped)  I never delayed in attending satsang I never left room for doubt in my mind (i.e. did my best to keep it free from concepts), and I always had faith in god. I did in fact have it all. I was "king of the world". Those were heady times for sure. Sorry you missed it. Modified by Steve at Fri, Aug 19, 2005, 21:58:36

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

This is a BIZARRE argument (but you're still wrong) --- Jim ( Fri, Aug 19, 2005, 22:23:02 ) ( 4702 bytes ) +2 Re: This is a BIZARRE argument (but seriously) --- paddy ( Fri, Aug 19, 2005, 22:59:06 ) ( 217 bytes ) +1 Re: This is a BIZARRE argument (but seriously) --- Jim ( Sat, Aug 20, 2005, 11:52:04 ) ( 266 bytes ) Re: This is a BIZARRE argument (but you're still wrong) --- Steve ( Fri, Aug 19, 2005, 23:41:19 ) ( 3251 bytes ) link +1 Sorry, but that's NOT what "devotion" meant --- Jim ( Sat, Aug 20, 2005, 11:37:46 ) ( 1854 bytes ) link +1 Let's agree to disagree --- Steve ( Sat, Aug 20, 2005, 17:35:21 ) ( 2987 bytes ) +1 Steve, if you can look at this fairly and dispassionately .... --- Jim ( Sat, Aug 20, 2005, 21:37:33 ) ( 1251 bytes ) +1 P.S. --- Jim ( Sat, Aug 20, 2005, 21:49:03 ) ( 988 bytes ) +1 Re: P.S. --- Steve ( Sun, Aug 21, 2005, 17:57:57 ) ( 931 bytes )