Re: Eileen, you might .........
Re: Eileen, you might ......... -- NikW	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: eileen ® 05/26/2005, 23:18:14 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

You really crack me up. You've got a person professing to all the media (though she forgot Good Morning America and Oprah) in total ex-premie lingo that she knows first hand about "today's most dangerous cult" after a four day crash course on the ex-premie website. And you think that's normal just because she agrees with you? And you want to argue with me and wonder why I don't want to pursue dialog?

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Eileen, you might ......... --- Rjchinook ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 02:48:12 ) ( 1407 bytes ) Re: Eileen, you might ......... --- NikW ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 03:19:14 ) ( 259 bytes ) Re: Eileen, you might ......... --- MarkT ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 04:22:57 ) ( 1252 bytes ) +1 Re: Eileen, you might ......... --- Jonti ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 07:47:03 ) ( 422 bytes ) Re: Hey Eileen! --- Pat W ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 07:05:07 ) ( 2452 bytes ) +1 Re: Hey Eileen! --- eileen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 12:49:52 ) ( 6476 bytes ) +5 Err pardon me Eileen --- hamzen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 15:36:35 ) ( 1675 bytes ) +1 Re: Err pardon me Hamzen --- eileen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 16:39:47 ) ( 1001 bytes ) +1 Er actually I was referring to that one post --- hamzen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 16:59:13 ) ( 1206 bytes ) +1 And the irony of you having a pop at Pat W --- hamzen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 17:29:03 ) ( 235 bytes ) +1 I think Pat is great - wasn't aware of any pop. (no text) --- eileen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 17:47:14 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1 YOU ARE VICTIMS - YOU ARE ALWAYS GOING TO BE VICTIMS!!! --- hamzen ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 18:17:00 ) ( 156 bytes ) Complete and utter nonsense, Eileen! --- Jim ( Fri, May 27, 2005, 18:52:26 ) ( 1639 bytes ) Re: Hey Eileen! --- Jonti ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 07:54:16 ) ( 1088 bytes ) link Eileen here's my reply --- Pat W ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 08:00:15 ) ( 10.3 KB ) Re: Hey Eileen! --- Sulla ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 19:20:27 ) ( 1389 bytes ) +1 Some answers for Sulla and others --- eileen ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 22:27:56 ) ( 1534 bytes ) +5 Re: Some answers for Sulla and others --- Sulla ( Sat, May 28, 2005, 23:53:51 ) ( 712 bytes ) Hmmm. --- Jonti ( Sun, May 29, 2005, 01:57:20 ) ( 1981 bytes ) link +1 Re: Hmmm. --- eileen ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 10:43:48 ) ( 676 bytes ) +2 Eileen, are you that dense? --- Babaluji ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 12:02:59 ) ( 648 bytes ) +1 Re: Eileen, are you that dense? --- eileen ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 12:24:13 ) ( 223 bytes ) +3 What is it with the 'you all''s? --- hamzen ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 12:36:09 ) ( 270 bytes ) I believe in RJ more than I believe in you, Eileen (no text) --- Babaluji ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 12:43:58 ) ( 0 bytes ) Eileen, try doing a Google search on RJChinook --- JHB ( Wed, Jun 01, 2005, 19:21:48 ) ( 384 bytes ) +1 validation of posters --- Jonti ( Fri, Jun 03, 2005, 12:04:27 ) ( 83 bytes ) +1 Re: validation of posters --- JHB ( Sat, Jun 04, 2005, 18:40:11 ) ( 284 bytes ) A cult shill; a liar and a hypocrite --- Jonti ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 13:27:55 ) ( 1564 bytes ) +1 What's a 'Shill'? <nt> --- Pat W ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 15:33:39 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 a false enthusiast (nt) (no text) --- Jonti ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 17:09:42 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Some answers for Sulla and others --- Rjchinook ( Sun, May 29, 2005, 03:53:30 ) ( 839 bytes ) Typically stupid new age misuse of the notion of responsibility --- Jim ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 11:36:45 ) ( 738 bytes ) The 'healing process' could end sooner, Eileen... --- Nigel ( Mon, May 30, 2005, 17:12:37 ) ( 3887 bytes )