I see a broken man
Re: Apology to Maharaji & premies -- John Macgregor	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Neville B ® 02/02/2005, 05:32:05 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Let's be clear: stealing documents is stupid. It left John wide open to legal attack. We've been warned. I see nothing in this apology to contradict his previous writings about M. That testimony stands. Neville B

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Stealing Documents: I See a Moral Man --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 08:58:25 ) ( 2284 bytes ) link +2 Please don't encourage breaking the law... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:08:09 ) ( 686 bytes ) +1 I Strongly Encourage Breaking The Law in Certain Situations.... --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:40:55 ) ( 2352 bytes ) +2 Jonathan, It's not your place to encourage --- JHB ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:03:59 ) ( 905 bytes ) +3 Thank you John... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:12:20 ) ( 370 bytes ) +1 Re: Thank you John... --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:36:39 ) ( 433 bytes ) Oh Yes it IS! --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:24:21 ) ( 1571 bytes ) +1 Oh Yes it IS! & Some Facts --- NikW ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:57:44 ) ( 2136 bytes ) +1 Re: Oh Yes it IS! & Some Facts --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 13:05:39 ) ( 917 bytes ) Point of order --- Candy ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 16:58:15 ) ( 1067 bytes ) +1 Re: Point of order --- JHB ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 17:19:40 ) ( 533 bytes ) +1 Re: Point of order --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 17:41:43 ) ( 876 bytes ) +2 Re: Point of order --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 19:33:54 ) ( 1704 bytes ) Exactly, the documents were not a smoking gun to a crime! --- Babaluji ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 22:40:29 ) ( 592 bytes ) +1 Re: Exactly, the documents were not a smoking gun to a crime! --- Jonathan ( Thu, Feb 03, 2005, 08:35:08 ) ( 522 bytes ) link but this is not the situation --- Susan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:22:53 ) ( 1247 bytes ) +2 Re: but this is not the situation --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:50:29 ) ( 654 bytes ) Right on Susan --- Joe ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 12:51:00 ) ( 1268 bytes ) Are you kidding? --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:32:52 ) ( 476 bytes ) +1 Just Pretending to be Clueless and Heartless, Jim? --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:52:29 ) ( 860 bytes ) +1 You're not thinking clearly, Jonathan --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:57:20 ) ( 173 bytes ) +1 You're not thinking (period), Jim --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:05:54 ) ( 468 bytes ) +2 That's pretty cold, Jonathan... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:31:53 ) ( 229 bytes ) +1 Re: That's pretty cold, Jonathan... --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 11:39:41 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 Sorry, I'll try.. --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 12:52:58 ) ( 1206 bytes ) +1 Re: Sorry, I'll try.. --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:05:41 ) ( 839 bytes ) Sorry, Jonathan, but you are SO MUCH not getting it --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 13:13:46 ) ( 782 bytes ) +2 And besides that... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 13:21:49 ) ( 327 bytes ) +1 Re: And besides that... --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 13:48:22 ) ( 895 bytes ) +1 I'm getting really sick of this polarization accusation. --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:00:20 ) ( 138 bytes ) +2 My 2c fwiw --- Thorin ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:25:32 ) ( 1323 bytes ) +3 No way --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:28:51 ) ( 264 bytes ) +1 Obviously a ring fence is required --- Thorin ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:37:07 ) ( 766 bytes ) +1 I agree about all but the money --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:51:58 ) ( 2064 bytes ) +1 Good points Jim --- Thorin ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 15:15:34 ) ( 681 bytes ) +1 Good points, T --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 15:35:02 ) ( 892 bytes ) Re: My 2c fwiw --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:37:16 ) ( 844 bytes ) I don't think so... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 15:07:40 ) ( 1240 bytes ) I Thought I Was Being Original --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:26:41 ) ( 324 bytes ) But, Jim but YOU are SO MUCH not getting it, RE: MORALITY! --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 13:33:55 ) ( 1313 bytes ) +2 Jonathan, you're responsible for this stupid argument -- stop it --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:04:22 ) ( 516 bytes ) +1 Jim, you're the one responsible for most stupidity on this forum, so stop it --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:17:27 ) ( 812 bytes ) +1 Okay, I've got it --- Jim ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:21:14 ) ( 88 bytes ) +1 Re: Okay, I've got it X 2 --- Jonathan ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:53:11 ) ( 518 bytes ) Jonathan, there are two women... --- Cynthia ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 14:06:30 ) ( 265 bytes ) No documents were stolen --- JHB ( Wed, Feb 02, 2005, 10:37:08 ) ( 278 bytes )