A question for you, Lexy
Re: Nice sermon, Reverend..... -- Lexy	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Sir Dave ® 01/18/2005, 06:25:35 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

When did you stop believing that Maharaji was the superior power in person, that is, presuming you did once believe that? Was it in the eighties when Maharaji kept saying he wasn't God?  I went to one program after 1983 in around 1986 in London and Maharaji made a point of saying he wasn't God.  Even then it went in one ear and out of the other with me.  I still thought he was God in a bod even though I no longer wanted to follow him.  That program was the last one I ever attended. Perhaps you also heard his words then expaining he wasn't God but didn't actually believe them.  Or did you by then realise he was just a master of some sort? Or was it more recently that you finally realised that Maharaji was just another bloke and not the greatest incarnation of God ever to walk the Earth - the powers of Jesus, Krishna and Buddha all rolled into one - the Father come to save the child from crawling into the fire - the Supreme Lord come with all 64 yogic powers, no less. I know this is a bit of a personal question and I don't mind if you don't feel you can answer. Modified by Sir Dave at Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 06:30:21

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: A question for you, Lexy ( Modified..Later ) --- Lexy ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 07:00:07 ) ( 1548 bytes ) +2 The message is really in the song, Lexy --- Sir Dave ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 15:21:02 ) ( 3235 bytes ) Wow, that's a powerful post Lexy --- cq ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 15:22:36 ) ( 1198 bytes ) +1 Premies and Integrity. --- Lexy ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 20:06:42 ) ( 2902 bytes ) +1 Re: Premies and Integrity. --- cq ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 13:24:20 ) ( 1127 bytes ) +1 Re: Premies and Integrity. --- Lexy ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 16:55:37 ) ( 876 bytes ) +1 Re: Premies and Integrity. --- cq ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 16:59:25 ) ( 544 bytes ) +2 ? ? ? --- Lexy ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 03:25:54 ) ( 138 bytes ) To the Moderators --- Tempora ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 04:32:29 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1 Explanation --- Pacific Mod ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 08:30:07 ) ( 288 bytes ) +1 Thanks Pacific Mod --- Tempora ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 09:04:33 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1 Thanks Pacific Mod - for very little --- cq ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:02:34 ) ( 1135 bytes ) +2 It don't even hurt them --- gerry ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:08:35 ) ( 397 bytes ) +1 OK, last post - and here's the warning label NUDITY OFFENDS SOME PEOPLE! --- cq ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 14:28:40 ) ( 566 bytes ) +1 Why the Mods have unchallenged powers of censorship here? --- Pacific Mod ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 19:07:42 ) ( 563 bytes ) +1 OK, one question, Mod --- Tempora ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 03:00:19 ) ( 336 bytes ) +1 Re: OK, one question, Mod --- Pat W ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 04:23:46 ) ( 1617 bytes ) +1 No, that's fine and dandy! --- Tempora ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 04:40:04 ) ( 164 bytes ) Come on cq... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:12:36 ) ( 977 bytes )