Re: Premies and Integrity.
Re: Premies and Integrity. -- Lexy	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: cq ® 01/19/2005, 13:24:20 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

"I can't really believe that my integrity or honesty is any better or worse than most premies" It's better, Lexy, for (at least) two reasons: 1. You're sharing your thoughts, feelings and ... yes, your doubts too, on a very public forum. That takes both integrity and honesty. Yes, there are some premies who have done that over the years, notably Sanford (who deserves an award for patience and perseverence in the face of opposition - while he was still a premie, if not even now!). But it seems most premies prefer to hide their doubts, and hide from them too. 2. You've exed. At least to the point of re-claiming your independence of thought/opinion. And consequently you've stopped trying to defend the indefensible. Which premies (apparently) are still obliged to try and do. (afterthought): Though, as a one-time premie myself, independence of thought was something I prided myself on, even while kissing Maharaj Ji's feet. In fact, I thought it was what allowed me to recognise "Him" in the first place. . . . Careful with those ribs, now! (as Adam might have once said) Modified by cq at Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 14:32:55

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: Premies and Integrity. --- Lexy ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 16:55:37 ) ( 876 bytes ) +1 Re: Premies and Integrity. --- cq ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 16:59:25 ) ( 544 bytes ) +2 ? ? ? --- Lexy ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 03:25:54 ) ( 138 bytes ) To the Moderators --- Tempora ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 04:32:29 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1 Explanation --- Pacific Mod ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 08:30:07 ) ( 288 bytes ) +1 Thanks Pacific Mod --- Tempora ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 09:04:33 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1 Thanks Pacific Mod - for very little --- cq ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:02:34 ) ( 1135 bytes ) +2 It don't even hurt them --- gerry ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:08:35 ) ( 397 bytes ) +1 OK, last post - and here's the warning label NUDITY OFFENDS SOME PEOPLE! --- cq ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 14:28:40 ) ( 566 bytes ) +1 Why the Mods have unchallenged powers of censorship here? --- Pacific Mod ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 19:07:42 ) ( 563 bytes ) +1 OK, one question, Mod --- Tempora ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 03:00:19 ) ( 336 bytes ) +1 Re: OK, one question, Mod --- Pat W ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 04:23:46 ) ( 1617 bytes ) +1 No, that's fine and dandy! --- Tempora ( Fri, Jan 21, 2005, 04:40:04 ) ( 164 bytes ) Come on cq... --- Cynthia ( Thu, Jan 20, 2005, 13:12:36 ) ( 977 bytes )