|
|
|
|||
|
| Re: I completely get it |  | ||
| Re: I completely get it -- Susan | Top of thread | Post Reply | Forum |
|
Yes, I remember Cynthia saying that Marolyn rather lorded it over the service premies, which was news to me, a different personality to the one I had imagined. There was the story of how he picked her - that she would come to the residence night after night and cry outside his window. I now realise that could be either a complete fabrication, a ploy by her, or it could be truthful - a sincere premie making an idiot of herself. She was a beautiful young woman, 8 years older than him and inches taller - even at the time it struck me as an incongruous couple and only possible to happen because it was Maharaji. Cynthia's info suggested to me a personality who was capable of bitch-lining it for the premie version of the alpha male - but I haven't seen her in action, as far as I know it still could be a premie bowled over by the power imbalance of dating the living lord. Not taking Rawat to task for the gum in her daughter's hair - it gets stark doesn't it but let's face it, premie parents sidelined their children in favour of Rawat around the world, let alone up close and personal. Now we have this new option out in front of us, that she is just as bad as her husband. A depraved woman rather than a broken one. Without a bit more to cement that possibility as the accurate one, I think I have to leave the possibility that she is broken on the table even as a less likely option it can't be ruled out. In my mind it's now pretty much only backed by the photos of her as a young woman - she looked so kindhearted and gentle. I do think from all our experiences we know how compromised we were by our belief in La Rawat, and it is logical to assume none more so than the woman who married him. It's just not reasonable to dismiss the option that she is broken rather than depraved on the basis of her being called depraved in a post that then got taken straight down. But still, I believe that poster, I think it was brave to put that up even for a short time, I think she felt angry that Marolyn was getting any sort of a free pass and I do respect that. Reverting to old codger talk, funny isn't it how there's all the action in youth and then unavoidably the grand theatre, the drama is on the other side of the hill. All the way, all the way it is actions not intentions that matter, who cares what the intention is compared to the consequence until we are looking back and then it's the intentions that matter - where it comes to assessing damage done was it accidental or deliberate, was it incidental or cruel? It's not that ultimately it matters much at all I would think - but sorting through the truth of the matter, the clarity and ease it brings, helps in itself with having comfort of mind. |
| Previous | Current page | Next |
| Replies to this message |
|
