Babaluji's tasteless vulgarity is often a joy to behold but he has no need to connect it to real human tragedies.
I am surprised you would say that. How can you state that HE HAS NO NEED.....? Writing is interpreted by the reader and he/she needs to use intelligence to understand HOW it was written and what intentions the writer had. M. Babaluji was putting clearly HIS opinion out and to say he applied tasteless vulgarity, in my opinion, isway too much. I understood his post.
It sounds like you are inviting sensorship.
