Why is it premies always talk about the "allegations" without any apparent interest, ability or intention to investigate them?  You say your father was the victim of a smear campaign, with people intentionally distorting the facts about him.  But your saying that means one of two things: either you know the facts yourself or you simply believe what you want to believe.  So which is it?  Were his enemies saying things about your father that you knew to be untrue or did you just believe that to be the case?

With respect to Rawat, what do you know?  Do you know for a fact that he's not a chronic alcoholic?  That it's not the case that he regularly starts drinking in the early evening and often gets so drunk he has to be carried off to bed?  See, there's a nasty allegation about him.  Are you really in any position to comment?

Or how about killing the bicyclist and letting some lowly premie take the rap? 

Or the real history and status of his affair(s) with Monica Lewis and other premies? 

And the list goes on. 

Do you know what really happened between him and his family?

Do you know how he really became the guru after his father died?

There's such an irony in the fact that Rawat used to challenge the world to investigate him but, in reality, that's the very, very, very last thing any premie can do.  So you're left accepting whatever he tells you.  That's a terrible position for an adult to be in.

Also, please comment on my post above where I give you proof of Rawat recently advising people about how to prepare for death.