wikipedia article in the endround

wikipedia article in the endround
			Forum

Posted by:
toby ^Ž

09/26/2004, 13:41:31
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

and it is a mess.
user zappaz is now trying to even delete the links to ex-premie.org and forum8 gallery on the criticism article because of copyright violation read this excerpt :

Zappaz

I agree to remove the disputed label.

Must go

* Lineage challenge (Misc. criticism section) - This is much better covered in the main article Prem Rawat
* Copyvio issues (to fulfill the GNU FDL and Wikipedia policy)
o Unless copyvio issues are resolved, all links to scanned images and pages sourced from www.forum8.org need to go. If they want to claim "fair use", we need credits: name of publication, source, and date. Otherwise these need to go.
o Links to documents from www.ex-premie.org that are blatant copyvio (such as full books, magazines tranbscribed or scanned) need to go as well.

---------------------------------------------------------
makes the criticism article which is a farce in itself a complete
tool for descrediting ex-premies

this guy has really fulfilled his order, i hope he costs rawat a lot of money

toby

Modified by toby at Sun, Sep 26, 2004, 14:18:22

Recommend View All Current page

Replies to this message

Re: wikipedia article in the endround --- Andries ( Sun, Sep 26, 2004, 14:56:43 ) ( 306 bytes ) +1

Re: wikipedia article in the endround --- toby ( Sun, Sep 26, 2004, 15:08:27 ) ( 187 bytes ) +1

Re: wikipedia article in the endround/copyright --- Andries ( Sun, Sep 26, 2004, 15:18:41 ) ( 228 bytes ) +2

Re: wikipedia article in the endround/copyright --- toby ( Sun, Sep 26, 2004, 15:27:42 ) ( 309 bytes )
Re: wikipedia article in the endround/copyright --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 09:20:40 ) ( 321 bytes ) +1

I think the article is good!... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 10:59:12 ) ( 1422 bytes ) +3

Re: I think the article is good!... --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 11:17:41 ) ( 930 bytes ) +2

OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- Andries ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 12:26:06 ) ( 541 bytes ) link +1

Re: OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- cq ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:02:54 ) ( 1142 bytes ) +1

Re: OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- Andries ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:37:09 ) ( 144 bytes ) +1

Must be a language problem, Andries. Please clarify. --- cq ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 17:34:53 ) ( 781 bytes ) +1

Re: Must be a language problem, Andries. Please clarify. --- Andries ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 14:54:31 ) ( 263 bytes )

excellent point toby --- dant ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:45:15 ) ( 257 bytes ) +1

Re: excellent point toby --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:57:52 ) ( 96 bytes ) +1

alles auf deutsch (ot) --- dant ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 16:15:09 ) ( 332 bytes )

the price to pay --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 13:32:39 ) ( 342 bytes ) +1

Re: the price to pay... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 14:47:24 ) ( 1193 bytes ) +2

thanks --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:05:55 ) ( 136 bytes ) +1

Well, Toby... --- Cynthia ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 06:42:35 ) ( 2279 bytes )

Rawat, wiki and child sex abuse --- Marianne ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:12:50 ) ( 328 bytes ) +2

Interesting word postioning? --- Grass Hopper ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 00:50:08 ) ( 341 bytes ) +2

Elan Vital and Pedophilia --- NikW ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 04:05:04 ) ( 1725 bytes )
Brush up on reading skills --- Marianne ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 10:58:47 ) ( 419 bytes ) +1

Not too bright are you? --- Grass Hopper ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 06:28:00 ) ( 284 bytes ) +1

Re: Not too bright are you? --- toby ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 10:52:53 ) ( 509 bytes )

Re: Rawat, wiki and child sex abuse --- Cynthia ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 06:55:47 ) ( 681 bytes ) +1

Wikipedophilia and the Rawat Cult --- gerry ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 12:11:00 ) ( 24 bytes )

Re: I think the article is good!.. To Cynthia --- Andries ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 15:11:37 ) ( 306 bytes )