I think the article is good!...
Re: Re: wikipedia article in the endround/copyright -- toby	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Cynthia ® 09/27/2004, 10:59:12 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

I just took a look at the articles. Given the enormous effort on the part of Elan Vital and premies to dominate the writing and editing of the Wiki articles, their success in persuading the Wikipedians toward their pro-Rawat point of view, as well as providing links to premies' anonymous and libellous websites, and the EV "hate-group" false allegations FAQs, I think they did a great job.  Elan Vital had to be involved in order to give only certain copyright permissions, so that's good too.  The main article looks like nothing more than a huge, over-written, over-the-top advertisement for Prem Rawat, and obviously and transparently comes off as a large bunch of sour grapes whenever ex-premies are mentioned.   On the "Criticism of Prem Rawat" article, they even managed to place link to the Scientology owned and operated website, Cult Awareness Network, a website that all of the legitimate cult awareness websites (that actually help people out of cults and to understand personality cults specifically) warn people to steer clear from.  That's good, IMO.  Overall, the premies and Elan Vital did well and I congratulate them on helping to expose Rawat for the conman and fake he really is and has been for over thirty years.  Modified by Cynthia at Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 11:15:01

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Re: I think the article is good!... --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 11:17:41 ) ( 930 bytes ) +2 OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- Andries ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 12:26:06 ) ( 541 bytes ) link +1 Re: OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- cq ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:02:54 ) ( 1142 bytes ) +1 Re: OT propaganda by small, unknown cults is a serious problem on Wikipedia. --- Andries ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:37:09 ) ( 144 bytes ) +1 Must be a language problem, Andries. Please clarify. --- cq ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 17:34:53 ) ( 781 bytes ) +1 Re: Must be a language problem, Andries. Please clarify. --- Andries ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 14:54:31 ) ( 263 bytes ) excellent point toby --- dant ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:45:15 ) ( 257 bytes ) +1 Re: excellent point toby --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:57:52 ) ( 96 bytes ) +1 alles auf deutsch (ot) --- dant ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 16:15:09 ) ( 332 bytes ) the price to pay --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 13:32:39 ) ( 342 bytes ) +1 Re: the price to pay... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 14:47:24 ) ( 1193 bytes ) +2 thanks --- toby ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:05:55 ) ( 136 bytes ) +1 Well, Toby... --- Cynthia ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 06:42:35 ) ( 2279 bytes ) Rawat, wiki and child sex abuse --- Marianne ( Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 15:12:50 ) ( 328 bytes ) +2 Interesting word postioning? --- Grass Hopper ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 00:50:08 ) ( 341 bytes ) +2 Elan Vital and Pedophilia --- NikW ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 04:05:04 ) ( 1725 bytes ) Brush up on reading skills --- Marianne ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 10:58:47 ) ( 419 bytes ) +1 Not too bright are you? --- Grass Hopper ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 06:28:00 ) ( 284 bytes ) +1 Re: Not too bright are you? --- toby ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 10:52:53 ) ( 509 bytes ) Re: Rawat, wiki and child sex abuse --- Cynthia ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 06:55:47 ) ( 681 bytes ) +1 Wikipedophilia and the Rawat Cult --- gerry ( Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 12:11:00 ) ( 24 bytes ) Re: I think the article is good!.. To Cynthia --- Andries ( Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 15:11:37 ) ( 306 bytes )